Demographics details for Lewiston, ID vs San francisco, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lewiston, ID vs San francisco, CA.

Data Lewiston San francisco
Population 34,896 808,437
Median Age 39.8 years 39.3 years
Median Income $63,109 $136,689
Married Families 39.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 3.6

Population Comparison: Lewiston vs San francisco

  • The population in San francisco is higher at 808,437, compared to 34,896 in Lewiston.
  • Residents in Lewiston have a higher median age of 39.8 years compared to 39.3 years in San francisco.
  • San francisco has a higher median income of $136,689, compared to $63,109 in Lewiston.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Lewiston at 39.0% compared to 38.0% in San francisco.
  • The poverty level is higher in San francisco at 12%, compared to 10% in Lewiston.
  • San francisco has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.1% in Lewiston.

Demographics

Demographics Lewiston vs San francisco provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lewiston San francisco
Black Data is updating 5
White 89 31
Asian 1 37
Hispanic 4 16
Two or More Races 5 10
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Lewiston vs San francisco

  • In San francisco, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Lewiston.
  • Lewiston has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 31% in San francisco.
  • In San francisco, the Asian population stands at 37%, greater than 1% in Lewiston.
  • San francisco has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 4% in Lewiston.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San francisco at 10%, compared to 5% in Lewiston.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lewiston and San francisco at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lewiston San francisco
Mental Health Not Good 16.6% 13.4%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 8.4%
Depression 24.4% 15.7%
Smoking 15.8% 9.2%
Binge Drinking 18.4% 16.4%
Obesity 36.2% 19.1%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lewiston vs San francisco

  • More residents in Lewiston report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 13.4% in San francisco.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Lewiston at 24.4% compared to 15.7% in San francisco.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lewiston at 15.8% compared to 9.2% in San francisco.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lewiston at 18.4% compared to 16.4% in San francisco.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lewiston at 36.2% compared to 19.1% in San francisco.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Lewiston at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in San francisco.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lewiston San francisco
No Schooling 0.8% (292) 3.0% (23,928)
High School Diploma 16.0% (5,600) 8.5% (68,418)
Less than High School 9.3% (3,257) 12.4% (99,947)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.6% (6,140) 50.3% (406,774)

Education Levels Comparison: Lewiston vs San francisco

  • In San francisco, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.8% in Lewiston.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lewiston hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 8.5% in San francisco.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San francisco at 12.4%, compared to 9.3% in Lewiston.
  • In San francisco, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.3% compared to 17.6% in Lewiston.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.