Demographics details for Lewiston, ID vs Andrews, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lewiston, ID vs Andrews, TX.
Data | Lewiston | Andrews |
---|---|---|
Population | 34,896 | 13,276 |
Median Age | 39.8 years | 31.9 years |
Median Income | $63,109 | $86,806 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Lewiston vs Andrews
- In Lewiston, the population is higher at 34,896, compared to 13,276 in Andrews.
- Residents in Lewiston have a higher median age of 39.8 years compared to 31.9 years in Andrews.
- Andrews has a higher median income of $86,806, compared to $63,109 in Lewiston.
- In Andrews, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 39.0% in Lewiston.
- The poverty level is identical in both Lewiston and Andrews at 10%.
- Andrews has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.1% in Lewiston.
Demographics
Demographics Lewiston vs Andrews provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lewiston | Andrews |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 3 |
White | 89 | 26 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 4 | 54 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 16 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lewiston vs Andrews
- In Andrews, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Lewiston.
- Lewiston has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 26% in Andrews.
- Both Lewiston and Andrews have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Andrews has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 54%, compared to 4% in Lewiston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Andrews at 16%, compared to 5% in Lewiston.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lewiston at 1% compared to 0% in Andrews.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lewiston | Andrews |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 17.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 12.8% |
Depression | 24.4% | 23.1% |
Smoking | 15.8% | 17.5% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 17.9% |
Obesity | 36.2% | 38.4% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lewiston vs Andrews
- In Andrews, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.6% in Lewiston.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lewiston at 24.4% compared to 23.1% in Andrews.
- Andrews has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 15.8% in Lewiston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lewiston at 18.4% compared to 17.9% in Andrews.
- Andrews has higher obesity rates at 38.4% compared to 36.2% in Lewiston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lewiston at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Andrews.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lewiston | Andrews |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (292) | 3.2% (428) |
High School Diploma | 16.0% (5,600) | 15.6% (2,070) |
Less than High School | 9.3% (3,257) | 27.9% (3,710) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.6% (6,140) | 13.4% (1,773) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lewiston vs Andrews
- In Andrews, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.8% in Lewiston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lewiston hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 15.6% in Andrews.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Andrews at 27.9%, compared to 9.3% in Lewiston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lewiston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.6% compared to 13.4% in Andrews.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.