Demographics details for Leonardville, KS vs Boomer, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Leonardville, KS vs Boomer, NC.
Data | Leonardville | Boomer |
---|---|---|
Population | 434 | 1,213 |
Median Age | 48.8 years | 53.9 years |
Median Income | $64,375 | $50,367 |
Married Families | 68.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Leonardville vs Boomer
- The population in Boomer is higher at 1,213, compared to 434 in Leonardville.
- The median age in Boomer is higher at 53.9 years, compared to 48.8 years in Leonardville.
- Leonardville has a higher median income of $64,375 compared to $50,367 in Boomer.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Leonardville at 68.0% compared to 44.0% in Boomer.
- The poverty level is higher in Boomer at 12%, compared to 10% in Leonardville.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Leonardville and Boomer at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Leonardville vs Boomer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Leonardville | Boomer |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 5 |
White | 83 | 91 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 16 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Leonardville vs Boomer
- In Boomer, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Leonardville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Boomer at 91% compared to 83% in Leonardville.
- Both Leonardville and Boomer have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Boomer has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Leonardville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Leonardville at 16% compared to 2% in Boomer.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Leonardville and Boomer at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Leonardville | Boomer |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.9% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 19.7% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 12.8% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 23.2% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 28.6% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Leonardville vs Boomer
- More residents in Leonardville report poor mental health at 13.9% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Depression is more prevalent in Leonardville at 19.7% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Leonardville at 12.8% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Binge drinking is more common in Leonardville at 23.2% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Obesity rates are higher in Leonardville at 28.6% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Disability percentages are higher in Leonardville at 21.0% compared to 18.0% in Boomer.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Leonardville | Boomer |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 39.2% (170) | 21.2% (257) |
Less than High School | 5.5% (24) | 25.9% (314) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (49) | 9.6% (116) |
Education Levels Comparison: Leonardville vs Boomer
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Leonardville and Boomer at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Leonardville hold a high school diploma at 39.2% compared to 21.2% in Boomer.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Boomer at 25.9%, compared to 5.5% in Leonardville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Leonardville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.3% compared to 9.6% in Boomer.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.