Demographics details for Leominster, MA vs Thornton, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Leominster, MA vs Thornton, CA.
| Data | Leominster | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,646 | 873 |
| Median Age | 43.0 years | 29.6 years |
| Median Income | $75,620 | $43,839 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 6.2 |
Population Comparison: Leominster vs Thornton
- In Leominster, the population is higher at 43,646, compared to 873 in Thornton.
- Residents in Leominster have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 29.6 years in Thornton.
- Leominster has a higher median income of $75,620 compared to $43,839 in Thornton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Leominster at 38.0% compared to 33.0% in Thornton.
- The poverty level is higher in Thornton at 10%, compared to 9% in Leominster.
- Thornton has a higher unemployment rate at 6.2% compared to 4.2% in Leominster.
Demographics
Demographics Leominster vs Thornton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Leominster | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 4 |
| White | 67 | 6 |
| Asian | 3 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 59 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 24 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Leominster vs Thornton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Leominster at 6% compared to 4% in Thornton.
- Leominster has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 6% in Thornton.
- In Thornton, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 3% in Leominster.
- Thornton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 59%, compared to 14% in Leominster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Thornton at 24%, compared to 10% in Leominster.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Leominster and Thornton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Leominster | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 15.9% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 19.0% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 14.0% |
| Obesity | 32.8% | 39.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Leominster vs Thornton
- In Thornton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.9% in Leominster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Leominster at 23.5% compared to 19.0% in Thornton.
- Thornton has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 15.5% in Leominster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Leominster at 16.9% compared to 14.0% in Thornton.
- Thornton has higher obesity rates at 39.8% compared to 32.8% in Leominster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Thornton at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Leominster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Leominster | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (477) | 4.5% (39) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (7,932) | 19.4% (169) |
| Less than High School | 13.5% (5,889) | 42.4% (370) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.1% (10,530) | 2.5% (22) |
Education Levels Comparison: Leominster vs Thornton
- In Thornton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 1.1% in Leominster.
- In Thornton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.4% compared to 18.2% in Leominster.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Thornton at 42.4%, compared to 13.5% in Leominster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Leominster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.1% compared to 2.5% in Thornton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.