Demographics details for Leominster, MA vs Russell springs, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Leominster, MA vs Russell springs, KY.

Data Leominster Russell springs
Population 43,646 2,750
Median Age 43.0 years 44.8 years
Median Income $75,620 $34,219
Married Families 38.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 9% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 4.5

Population Comparison: Leominster vs Russell springs

  • In Leominster, the population is higher at 43,646, compared to 2,750 in Russell springs.
  • The median age in Russell springs is higher at 44.8 years, compared to 43.0 years in Leominster.
  • Leominster has a higher median income of $75,620 compared to $34,219 in Russell springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Leominster at 38.0% compared to 29.0% in Russell springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Russell springs at 15%, compared to 9% in Leominster.
  • Russell springs has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Leominster.

Demographics

Demographics Leominster vs Russell springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Leominster Russell springs
Black 6 1
White 67 88
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 14 3
Two or More Races 10 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Leominster vs Russell springs

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Leominster at 6% compared to 1% in Russell springs.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Russell springs at 88% compared to 67% in Leominster.
  • The Asian population is larger in Leominster at 3% compared to 0% in Russell springs.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Leominster at 14% compared to 3% in Russell springs.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Leominster at 10% compared to 8% in Russell springs.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Leominster and Russell springs at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Leominster Russell springs
Mental Health Not Good 17.9% 20.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.6% 15.6%
Depression 23.5% 29.0%
Smoking 15.5% 25.6%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 14.5%
Obesity 32.8% 40.3%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Leominster vs Russell springs

  • In Russell springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 17.9% in Leominster.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Russell springs at 29.0% versus 23.5% in Leominster.
  • Russell springs has a higher smoking rate at 25.6% compared to 15.5% in Leominster.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Leominster at 16.9% compared to 14.5% in Russell springs.
  • Russell springs has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 32.8% in Leominster.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Russell springs at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Leominster.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Leominster Russell springs
No Schooling 1.1% (477) 0.7% (20)
High School Diploma 18.2% (7,932) 13.6% (375)
Less than High School 13.5% (5,889) 23.3% (642)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 24.1% (10,530) 18.4% (505)

Education Levels Comparison: Leominster vs Russell springs

  • A higher percentage of residents in Leominster have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.7% in Russell springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Leominster hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 13.6% in Russell springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Russell springs at 23.3%, compared to 13.5% in Leominster.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Leominster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.1% compared to 18.4% in Russell springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.