Demographics details for Leominster, MA vs Powder springs, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Leominster, MA vs Powder springs, GA.

Data Leominster Powder springs
Population 43,646 17,337
Median Age 43.0 years 38.7 years
Median Income $75,620 $88,311
Married Families 38.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 9% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Leominster vs Powder springs

  • In Leominster, the population is higher at 43,646, compared to 17,337 in Powder springs.
  • Residents in Leominster have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 38.7 years in Powder springs.
  • Powder springs has a higher median income of $88,311, compared to $75,620 in Leominster.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Leominster at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Powder springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Powder springs at 12%, compared to 9% in Leominster.
  • The unemployment rate in Leominster is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Powder springs.

Demographics

Demographics Leominster vs Powder springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Leominster Powder springs
Black 6 51
White 67 22
Asian 3 2
Hispanic 14 19
Two or More Races 10 5
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Leominster vs Powder springs

  • In Powder springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 51% compared to 6% in Leominster.
  • Leominster has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 22% in Powder springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Leominster at 3% compared to 2% in Powder springs.
  • Powder springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 14% in Leominster.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Leominster at 10% compared to 5% in Powder springs.
  • In Powder springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Leominster.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Leominster Powder springs
Mental Health Not Good 17.9% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good 10.6% 10.7%
Depression 23.5% 17.7%
Smoking 15.5% 14.4%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 14.4%
Obesity 32.8% 33.0%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Leominster vs Powder springs

  • More residents in Leominster report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.0% in Powder springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Leominster at 23.5% compared to 17.7% in Powder springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Leominster at 15.5% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Leominster at 16.9% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
  • Powder springs has higher obesity rates at 33.0% compared to 32.8% in Leominster.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Leominster at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Powder springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Leominster Powder springs
No Schooling 1.1% (477) 1.3% (225)
High School Diploma 18.2% (7,932) 15.0% (2,598)
Less than High School 13.5% (5,889) 7.6% (1,309)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 24.1% (10,530) 26.3% (4,561)

Education Levels Comparison: Leominster vs Powder springs

  • In Powder springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.1% in Leominster.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Leominster hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 15.0% in Powder springs.
  • More residents in Leominster have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 7.6% in Powder springs.
  • In Powder springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 24.1% in Leominster.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.