Demographics details for Leominster, MA vs Onalaska, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Leominster, MA vs Onalaska, TX.
| Data | Leominster | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,646 | 3,205 |
| Median Age | 43.0 years | 45.2 years |
| Median Income | $75,620 | $56,168 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Leominster vs Onalaska
- In Leominster, the population is higher at 43,646, compared to 3,205 in Onalaska.
- The median age in Onalaska is higher at 45.2 years, compared to 43.0 years in Leominster.
- Leominster has a higher median income of $75,620 compared to $56,168 in Onalaska.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Leominster at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Onalaska.
- The poverty level is higher in Onalaska at 12%, compared to 9% in Leominster.
- Onalaska has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Leominster.
Demographics
Demographics Leominster vs Onalaska provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Leominster | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 1 |
| White | 67 | 91 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 14 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Leominster vs Onalaska
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Leominster at 6% compared to 1% in Onalaska.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Onalaska at 91% compared to 67% in Leominster.
- The Asian population is larger in Leominster at 3% compared to 0% in Onalaska.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Leominster at 14% compared to 3% in Onalaska.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Leominster at 10% compared to 5% in Onalaska.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Leominster and Onalaska at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Leominster | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 26.0% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 32.8% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Leominster vs Onalaska
- In Onalaska, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.9% in Leominster.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Onalaska at 26.0% versus 23.5% in Leominster.
- Onalaska has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 15.5% in Leominster.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Onalaska at 19.4% compared to 16.9% in Leominster.
- Onalaska has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 32.8% in Leominster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Onalaska at 24.0% compared to 12.0% in Leominster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Leominster | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (477) | 0.7% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (7,932) | 15.3% (491) |
| Less than High School | 13.5% (5,889) | 21.5% (689) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.1% (10,530) | 5.0% (161) |
Education Levels Comparison: Leominster vs Onalaska
- A higher percentage of residents in Leominster have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.7% in Onalaska.
- A higher percentage of residents in Leominster hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 15.3% in Onalaska.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Onalaska at 21.5%, compared to 13.5% in Leominster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Leominster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.1% compared to 5.0% in Onalaska.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.