Demographics details for Leominster, MA vs Little rock, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Leominster, MA vs Little rock, AR.
Data | Leominster | Little rock |
---|---|---|
Population | 43,646 | 202,864 |
Median Age | 43.0 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $75,620 | $58,697 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Leominster vs Little rock
- The population in Little rock is higher at 202,864, compared to 43,646 in Leominster.
- Residents in Leominster have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 36.6 years in Little rock.
- Leominster has a higher median income of $75,620 compared to $58,697 in Little rock.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Leominster at 38.0% compared to 32.0% in Little rock.
- The poverty level is higher in Little rock at 14%, compared to 9% in Leominster.
- The unemployment rate in Leominster is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.7% in Little rock.
Demographics
Demographics Leominster vs Little rock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Leominster | Little rock |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 41 |
White | 67 | 44 |
Asian | 3 | 3 |
Hispanic | 14 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Leominster vs Little rock
- In Little rock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 6% in Leominster.
- Leominster has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 44% in Little rock.
- Both Leominster and Little rock have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Leominster at 14% compared to 8% in Little rock.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Leominster at 10% compared to 4% in Little rock.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Leominster and Little rock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Leominster | Little rock |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 16.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 12.0% |
Depression | 23.5% | 21.9% |
Smoking | 15.5% | 19.0% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 12.9% |
Obesity | 32.8% | 39.0% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Leominster vs Little rock
- More residents in Leominster report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.9% in Little rock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Leominster at 23.5% compared to 21.9% in Little rock.
- Little rock has a higher smoking rate at 19.0% compared to 15.5% in Leominster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Leominster at 16.9% compared to 12.9% in Little rock.
- Little rock has higher obesity rates at 39.0% compared to 32.8% in Leominster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Little rock at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Leominster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Leominster | Little rock |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (477) | 0.7% (1,359) |
High School Diploma | 18.2% (7,932) | 12.2% (24,667) |
Less than High School | 13.5% (5,889) | 7.3% (14,766) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.1% (10,530) | 29.4% (59,641) |
Education Levels Comparison: Leominster vs Little rock
- A higher percentage of residents in Leominster have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.7% in Little rock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Leominster hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 12.2% in Little rock.
- More residents in Leominster have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 7.3% in Little rock.
- In Little rock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 24.1% in Leominster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.