Demographics details for Leominster, MA vs Highland, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Leominster, MA vs Highland, KS.
| Data | Leominster | Highland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,646 | 915 |
| Median Age | 43.0 years | 20.4 years |
| Median Income | $75,620 | $65,000 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Leominster vs Highland
- In Leominster, the population is higher at 43,646, compared to 915 in Highland.
- Residents in Leominster have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 20.4 years in Highland.
- Leominster has a higher median income of $75,620 compared to $65,000 in Highland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Leominster at 38.0% compared to 25.0% in Highland.
- Leominster has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Highland.
- The unemployment rate in Leominster is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Highland.
Demographics
Demographics Leominster vs Highland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Leominster | Highland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 33 |
| White | 67 | 51 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Leominster vs Highland
- In Highland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 33% compared to 6% in Leominster.
- Leominster has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 51% in Highland.
- The Asian population is larger in Leominster at 3% compared to 1% in Highland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Leominster at 14% compared to 7% in Highland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Leominster at 10% compared to 8% in Highland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Leominster and Highland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Leominster | Highland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 21.5% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 19.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 19.2% |
| Obesity | 32.8% | 40.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Leominster vs Highland
- More residents in Leominster report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.5% in Highland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Leominster at 23.5% compared to 21.5% in Highland.
- Highland has a higher smoking rate at 19.7% compared to 15.5% in Leominster.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Highland at 19.2% compared to 16.9% in Leominster.
- Highland has higher obesity rates at 40.1% compared to 32.8% in Leominster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Highland at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Leominster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Leominster | Highland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (477) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (7,932) | 7.5% (69) |
| Less than High School | 13.5% (5,889) | 6.1% (56) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.1% (10,530) | 15.3% (140) |
Education Levels Comparison: Leominster vs Highland
- A higher percentage of residents in Leominster have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Highland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Leominster hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 7.5% in Highland.
- More residents in Leominster have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 6.1% in Highland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Leominster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.1% compared to 15.3% in Highland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.