Demographics details for Leominster, MA vs Hanford, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Leominster, MA vs Hanford, CA.

Data Leominster Hanford
Population 43,646 58,470
Median Age 43.0 years 32.7 years
Median Income $75,620 $73,819
Married Families 38.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 9% 13%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 7.0

Population Comparison: Leominster vs Hanford

  • The population in Hanford is higher at 58,470, compared to 43,646 in Leominster.
  • Residents in Leominster have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 32.7 years in Hanford.
  • Leominster has a higher median income of $75,620 compared to $73,819 in Hanford.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Leominster at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Hanford.
  • The poverty level is higher in Hanford at 13%, compared to 9% in Leominster.
  • Hanford has a higher unemployment rate at 7.0% compared to 4.2% in Leominster.

Demographics

Demographics Leominster vs Hanford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Leominster Hanford
Black 6 7
White 67 23
Asian 3 4
Hispanic 14 50
Two or More Races 10 15
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Leominster vs Hanford

  • In Hanford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 6% in Leominster.
  • Leominster has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 23% in Hanford.
  • In Hanford, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Leominster.
  • Hanford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 50%, compared to 14% in Leominster.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hanford at 15%, compared to 10% in Leominster.
  • In Hanford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Leominster.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Leominster Hanford
Mental Health Not Good 17.9% 17.0%
Physical Health Not Good 10.6% 12.6%
Depression 23.5% 19.4%
Smoking 15.5% 14.0%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 16.4%
Obesity 32.8% 33.3%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Leominster vs Hanford

  • More residents in Leominster report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.0% in Hanford.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Leominster at 23.5% compared to 19.4% in Hanford.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Leominster at 15.5% compared to 14.0% in Hanford.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Leominster at 16.9% compared to 16.4% in Hanford.
  • Hanford has higher obesity rates at 33.3% compared to 32.8% in Leominster.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Leominster and Hanford at 12.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Leominster Hanford
No Schooling 1.1% (477) 1.7% (991)
High School Diploma 18.2% (7,932) 14.0% (8,215)
Less than High School 13.5% (5,889) 21.2% (12,424)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 24.1% (10,530) 11.6% (6,806)

Education Levels Comparison: Leominster vs Hanford

  • In Hanford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.1% in Leominster.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Leominster hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 14.0% in Hanford.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hanford at 21.2%, compared to 13.5% in Leominster.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Leominster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.1% compared to 11.6% in Hanford.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.