Demographics details for Leominster, MA vs Fayetteville, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Leominster, MA vs Fayetteville, GA.

Data Leominster Fayetteville
Population 43,646 19,687
Median Age 43.0 years 43.4 years
Median Income $75,620 $79,865
Married Families 38.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 9% 6%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Leominster vs Fayetteville

  • In Leominster, the population is higher at 43,646, compared to 19,687 in Fayetteville.
  • The median age in Fayetteville is higher at 43.4 years, compared to 43.0 years in Leominster.
  • Fayetteville has a higher median income of $79,865, compared to $75,620 in Leominster.
  • In Fayetteville, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 38.0% in Leominster.
  • Leominster has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 6% in Fayetteville.
  • The unemployment rate in Leominster is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Fayetteville.

Demographics

Demographics Leominster vs Fayetteville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Leominster Fayetteville
Black 6 39
White 67 45
Asian 3 5
Hispanic 14 6
Two or More Races 10 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Leominster vs Fayetteville

  • In Fayetteville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 39% compared to 6% in Leominster.
  • Leominster has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 45% in Fayetteville.
  • In Fayetteville, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 3% in Leominster.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Leominster at 14% compared to 6% in Fayetteville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Leominster at 10% compared to 5% in Fayetteville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Leominster and Fayetteville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Leominster Fayetteville
Mental Health Not Good 17.9% 14.4%
Physical Health Not Good 10.6% 9.6%
Depression 23.5% 19.1%
Smoking 15.5% 12.6%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 15.8%
Obesity 32.8% 30.1%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Leominster vs Fayetteville

  • More residents in Leominster report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 14.4% in Fayetteville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Leominster at 23.5% compared to 19.1% in Fayetteville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Leominster at 15.5% compared to 12.6% in Fayetteville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Leominster at 16.9% compared to 15.8% in Fayetteville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Leominster at 32.8% compared to 30.1% in Fayetteville.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Leominster and Fayetteville at 12.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Leominster Fayetteville
No Schooling 1.1% (477) 0.5% (106)
High School Diploma 18.2% (7,932) 15.6% (3,062)
Less than High School 13.5% (5,889) 4.8% (937)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 24.1% (10,530) 25.1% (4,939)

Education Levels Comparison: Leominster vs Fayetteville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Leominster have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.5% in Fayetteville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Leominster hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 15.6% in Fayetteville.
  • More residents in Leominster have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 4.8% in Fayetteville.
  • In Fayetteville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.1% compared to 24.1% in Leominster.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.