Demographics details for Leominster, MA vs Chewelah, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Leominster, MA vs Chewelah, WA.
| Data | Leominster | Chewelah |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,646 | 2,570 |
| Median Age | 43.0 years | 49.0 years |
| Median Income | $75,620 | $52,905 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Leominster vs Chewelah
- In Leominster, the population is higher at 43,646, compared to 2,570 in Chewelah.
- The median age in Chewelah is higher at 49.0 years, compared to 43.0 years in Leominster.
- Leominster has a higher median income of $75,620 compared to $52,905 in Chewelah.
- In Chewelah, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 38.0% in Leominster.
- The poverty level is higher in Chewelah at 10%, compared to 9% in Leominster.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Leominster and Chewelah at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Leominster vs Chewelah provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Leominster | Chewelah |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | Data is updating |
| White | 67 | 90 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 14 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Leominster vs Chewelah
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Leominster at 6% compared to 0% in Chewelah.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chewelah at 90% compared to 67% in Leominster.
- The Asian population is larger in Leominster at 3% compared to 0% in Chewelah.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Leominster at 14% compared to 4% in Chewelah.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Leominster at 10% compared to 5% in Chewelah.
- In Chewelah, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Leominster.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Leominster | Chewelah |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 14.1% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 29.5% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 19.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 32.8% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Leominster vs Chewelah
- In Chewelah, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 17.9% in Leominster.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chewelah at 29.5% versus 23.5% in Leominster.
- Chewelah has a higher smoking rate at 19.7% compared to 15.5% in Leominster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Leominster at 16.9% compared to 15.6% in Chewelah.
- Chewelah has higher obesity rates at 33.7% compared to 32.8% in Leominster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chewelah at 22.0% compared to 12.0% in Leominster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Leominster | Chewelah |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (477) | 0.4% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (7,932) | 20.3% (522) |
| Less than High School | 13.5% (5,889) | 12.3% (316) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.1% (10,530) | 14.5% (373) |
Education Levels Comparison: Leominster vs Chewelah
- A higher percentage of residents in Leominster have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Chewelah.
- In Chewelah, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.3% compared to 18.2% in Leominster.
- More residents in Leominster have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 12.3% in Chewelah.
- A higher percentage of residents in Leominster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.1% compared to 14.5% in Chewelah.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.