Demographics details for Lena, MS vs Harrisonville, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lena, MS vs Harrisonville, MO.
Data | Lena | Harrisonville |
---|---|---|
Population | 155 | 9,854 |
Median Age | 45.1 years | 36.9 years |
Median Income | $85,000 | $57,607 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Lena vs Harrisonville
- The population in Harrisonville is higher at 9,854, compared to 155 in Lena.
- Residents in Lena have a higher median age of 45.1 years compared to 36.9 years in Harrisonville.
- Lena has a higher median income of $85,000 compared to $57,607 in Harrisonville.
- In Harrisonville, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 25.0% in Lena.
- The poverty level is higher in Harrisonville at 11%, compared to 10% in Lena.
- The unemployment rate in Lena is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Harrisonville.
Demographics
Demographics Lena vs Harrisonville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lena | Harrisonville |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 1 |
White | 95 | 91 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lena vs Harrisonville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lena at 3% compared to 1% in Harrisonville.
- Lena has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 91% in Harrisonville.
- Both Lena and Harrisonville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Harrisonville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Lena.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Harrisonville at 5%, compared to 1% in Lena.
- In Harrisonville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lena.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lena | Harrisonville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 19.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 13.4% |
Depression | 24.7% | 25.9% |
Smoking | 25.1% | 23.7% |
Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 16.6% |
Obesity | 40.6% | 40.5% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lena vs Harrisonville
- In Harrisonville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 19.0% in Lena.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Harrisonville at 25.9% versus 24.7% in Lena.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lena at 25.1% compared to 23.7% in Harrisonville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Harrisonville at 16.6% compared to 15.2% in Lena.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lena at 40.6% compared to 40.5% in Harrisonville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Harrisonville at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Lena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lena | Harrisonville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (15) |
High School Diploma | 8.4% (13) | 22.8% (2,244) |
Less than High School | 5.2% (8) | 17.1% (1,687) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (23) | 12.7% (1,255) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lena vs Harrisonville
- In Harrisonville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Lena.
- In Harrisonville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.8% compared to 8.4% in Lena.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Harrisonville at 17.1%, compared to 5.2% in Lena.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lena hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 12.7% in Harrisonville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.