Demographics details for Lena, MS vs Big springs, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lena, MS vs Big springs, NE.
| Data | Lena | Big springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 155 | 408 |
| Median Age | 45.1 years | 53.5 years |
| Median Income | $85,000 | $65,694 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 55.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Lena vs Big springs
- The population in Big springs is higher at 408, compared to 155 in Lena.
- The median age in Big springs is higher at 53.5 years, compared to 45.1 years in Lena.
- Lena has a higher median income of $85,000 compared to $65,694 in Big springs.
- In Big springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 25.0% in Lena.
- The poverty level is identical in both Lena and Big springs at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Lena is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Big springs.
Demographics
Demographics Lena vs Big springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lena | Big springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 95 | 75 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Lena vs Big springs
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lena at 3% compared to 0% in Big springs.
- Lena has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 75% in Big springs.
- Both Lena and Big springs have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Big springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 1% in Lena.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Big springs at 7%, compared to 1% in Lena.
- In Big springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Lena.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lena | Big springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 25.1% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 21.1% |
| Obesity | 40.6% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lena vs Big springs
- More residents in Lena report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 14.4% in Big springs.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lena at 24.7% compared to 17.8% in Big springs.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lena at 25.1% compared to 17.0% in Big springs.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Big springs at 21.1% compared to 15.2% in Lena.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lena at 40.6% compared to 39.5% in Big springs.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Big springs at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Lena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lena | Big springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 8.4% (13) | 19.4% (79) |
| Less than High School | 5.2% (8) | 22.1% (90) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (23) | 16.7% (68) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lena vs Big springs
- In Big springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Lena.
- In Big springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.4% compared to 8.4% in Lena.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Big springs at 22.1%, compared to 5.2% in Lena.
- In Big springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.7% compared to 14.8% in Lena.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.