Demographics details for Leitchfield, KY vs Mountain home, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Leitchfield, KY vs Mountain home, AR.

Data Leitchfield Mountain home
Population 6,432 13,150
Median Age 38.8 years 41.8 years
Median Income $43,214 $42,281
Married Families 25.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 14% 14%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Leitchfield vs Mountain home

  • The population in Mountain home is higher at 13,150, compared to 6,432 in Leitchfield.
  • The median age in Mountain home is higher at 41.8 years, compared to 38.8 years in Leitchfield.
  • Leitchfield has a higher median income of $43,214 compared to $42,281 in Mountain home.
  • In Mountain home, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 25.0% in Leitchfield.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Leitchfield and Mountain home at 14%.
  • Mountain home has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Leitchfield.

Demographics

Demographics Leitchfield vs Mountain home provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Leitchfield Mountain home
Black 2 Data is updating
White 95 90
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 4
Two or More Races 3 4
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Leitchfield vs Mountain home

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Leitchfield at 2% compared to 0% in Mountain home.
  • Leitchfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 90% in Mountain home.
  • In Mountain home, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Leitchfield.
  • Mountain home has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Leitchfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mountain home at 4%, compared to 3% in Leitchfield.
  • In Mountain home, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Leitchfield.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Leitchfield Mountain home
Mental Health Not Good 21.3% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 16.7% 12.9%
Depression 30.0% 28.5%
Smoking 27.5% 21.1%
Binge Drinking 14.1% 16.3%
Obesity 41.5% 34.3%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 22.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Leitchfield vs Mountain home

  • More residents in Leitchfield report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 19.2% in Mountain home.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Leitchfield at 30.0% compared to 28.5% in Mountain home.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Leitchfield at 27.5% compared to 21.1% in Mountain home.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Mountain home at 16.3% compared to 14.1% in Leitchfield.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Leitchfield at 41.5% compared to 34.3% in Mountain home.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mountain home at 22.0% compared to 16.0% in Leitchfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Leitchfield Mountain home
No Schooling 0.3% (21) 0.7% (87)
High School Diploma 28.3% (1,821) 16.9% (2,225)
Less than High School 23.4% (1,504) 14.2% (1,870)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.4% (540) 15.0% (1,973)

Education Levels Comparison: Leitchfield vs Mountain home

  • In Mountain home, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Leitchfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Leitchfield hold a high school diploma at 28.3% compared to 16.9% in Mountain home.
  • More residents in Leitchfield have less than a high school education at 23.4% compared to 14.2% in Mountain home.
  • In Mountain home, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 8.4% in Leitchfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.