Demographics details for Leitchfield, KY vs Eau galle, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Leitchfield, KY vs Eau galle, WI.

Data Leitchfield Eau galle
Population 6,432 1,224
Median Age 38.8 years 38.0 years
Median Income $43,214 $60,000
Married Families 25.0% 320.0%
Poverty Level 14% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Leitchfield vs Eau galle

  • In Leitchfield, the population is higher at 6,432, compared to 1,224 in Eau galle.
  • Residents in Leitchfield have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 38.0 years in Eau galle.
  • Eau galle has a higher median income of $60,000, compared to $43,214 in Leitchfield.
  • In Eau galle, the percentage of married families is higher at 320.0%, compared to 25.0% in Leitchfield.
  • Leitchfield has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in Eau galle.
  • Eau galle has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Leitchfield.

Demographics

Demographics Leitchfield vs Eau galle provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Leitchfield Eau galle
Black 2 Data is updating
White 95 100
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating Data is updating
Two or More Races 3 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Leitchfield vs Eau galle

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Leitchfield at 2% compared to 0% in Eau galle.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Eau galle at 100% compared to 95% in Leitchfield.
  • Both Leitchfield and Eau galle have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Leitchfield and Eau galle at 0%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Leitchfield at 3% compared to 0% in Eau galle.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Leitchfield and Eau galle at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Leitchfield Eau galle
Mental Health Not Good 21.3% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 16.7% Data is updating%
Depression 30.0% Data is updating%
Smoking 27.5% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 14.1% Data is updating%
Obesity 41.5% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 16.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Leitchfield vs Eau galle

  • More residents in Leitchfield report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 0.0% in Eau galle.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Leitchfield at 30.0% compared to 0.0% in Eau galle.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Leitchfield at 27.5% compared to 0.0% in Eau galle.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Leitchfield at 14.1% compared to 0.0% in Eau galle.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Leitchfield at 41.5% compared to 0.0% in Eau galle.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Leitchfield at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Eau galle.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Leitchfield Eau galle
No Schooling 0.3% (21) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 28.3% (1,821) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 23.4% (1,504) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.4% (540) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Leitchfield vs Eau galle

  • A higher percentage of residents in Leitchfield have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Eau galle.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Leitchfield hold a high school diploma at 28.3% compared to 0.0% in Eau galle.
  • More residents in Leitchfield have less than a high school education at 23.4% compared to 0.0% in Eau galle.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Leitchfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.4% compared to 0.0% in Eau galle.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.