Demographics details for Leitchfield, KY vs Cedar lake, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Leitchfield, KY vs Cedar lake, IN.

Data Leitchfield Cedar lake
Population 6,432 15,592
Median Age 38.8 years 39.5 years
Median Income $43,214 $84,444
Married Families 25.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 14% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Leitchfield vs Cedar lake

  • The population in Cedar lake is higher at 15,592, compared to 6,432 in Leitchfield.
  • The median age in Cedar lake is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 38.8 years in Leitchfield.
  • Cedar lake has a higher median income of $84,444, compared to $43,214 in Leitchfield.
  • In Cedar lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 25.0% in Leitchfield.
  • Leitchfield has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in Cedar lake.
  • Cedar lake has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Leitchfield.

Demographics

Demographics Leitchfield vs Cedar lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Leitchfield Cedar lake
Black 2 Data is updating
White 95 94
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 3
Two or More Races 3 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Leitchfield vs Cedar lake

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Leitchfield at 2% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
  • Leitchfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 94% in Cedar lake.
  • Both Leitchfield and Cedar lake have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Cedar lake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Leitchfield.
  • Both Leitchfield and Cedar lake have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Leitchfield and Cedar lake at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Leitchfield Cedar lake
Mental Health Not Good 21.3% 16.6%
Physical Health Not Good 16.7% 11.1%
Depression 30.0% 25.4%
Smoking 27.5% 18.8%
Binge Drinking 14.1% 19.8%
Obesity 41.5% 37.2%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Leitchfield vs Cedar lake

  • More residents in Leitchfield report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 16.6% in Cedar lake.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Leitchfield at 30.0% compared to 25.4% in Cedar lake.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Leitchfield at 27.5% compared to 18.8% in Cedar lake.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar lake at 19.8% compared to 14.1% in Leitchfield.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Leitchfield at 41.5% compared to 37.2% in Cedar lake.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Leitchfield at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar lake.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Leitchfield Cedar lake
No Schooling 0.3% (21) 0.4% (67)
High School Diploma 28.3% (1,821) 21.1% (3,292)
Less than High School 23.4% (1,504) 7.1% (1,102)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.4% (540) 14.1% (2,204)

Education Levels Comparison: Leitchfield vs Cedar lake

  • In Cedar lake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Leitchfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Leitchfield hold a high school diploma at 28.3% compared to 21.1% in Cedar lake.
  • More residents in Leitchfield have less than a high school education at 23.4% compared to 7.1% in Cedar lake.
  • In Cedar lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 8.4% in Leitchfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.