Demographics details for Leesville, LA vs Aulander, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Leesville, LA vs Aulander, NC.
Data | Leesville | Aulander |
---|---|---|
Population | 6,612 | 727 |
Median Age | 34.0 years | 42.4 years |
Median Income | $46,000 | $33,250 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 23.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Leesville vs Aulander
- In Leesville, the population is higher at 6,612, compared to 727 in Aulander.
- The median age in Aulander is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 34.0 years in Leesville.
- Leesville has a higher median income of $46,000 compared to $33,250 in Aulander.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Leesville at 45.0% compared to 23.0% in Aulander.
- Leesville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 14% in Aulander.
- Aulander has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 4.0% in Leesville.
Demographics
Demographics Leesville vs Aulander provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Leesville | Aulander |
---|---|---|
Black | 30 | 61 |
White | 60 | 38 |
Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 2 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Leesville vs Aulander
- In Aulander, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 61% compared to 30% in Leesville.
- Leesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 38% in Aulander.
- The Asian population is larger in Leesville at 5% compared to 0% in Aulander.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Leesville at 3% compared to 0% in Aulander.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Leesville at 2% compared to 1% in Aulander.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Leesville and Aulander at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Leesville | Aulander |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 14.7% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 23.5% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 23.9% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 14.2% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 44.9% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Leesville vs Aulander
- In Aulander, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 0.0% in Leesville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Aulander at 23.5% versus 0.0% in Leesville.
- Aulander has a higher smoking rate at 23.9% compared to 0.0% in Leesville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Aulander at 14.2% compared to 0.0% in Leesville.
- Aulander has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 0.0% in Leesville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Aulander at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Leesville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Leesville | Aulander |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (3) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 13.3% (97) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 28.5% (207) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.9% (21) |
Education Levels Comparison: Leesville vs Aulander
- In Aulander, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Leesville.
- In Aulander, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.3% compared to 0.0% in Leesville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Aulander at 28.5%, compared to 0.0% in Leesville.
- In Aulander, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 2.9% compared to 0.0% in Leesville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.