Demographics details for Leesburg, VA vs Taylorsville, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Leesburg, VA vs Taylorsville, GA.
Data | Leesburg | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
Population | 48,974 | 258 |
Median Age | 34.8 years | 56.7 years |
Median Income | $132,298 | $41,250 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 62.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.8 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Leesburg vs Taylorsville
- In Leesburg, the population is higher at 48,974, compared to 258 in Taylorsville.
- The median age in Taylorsville is higher at 56.7 years, compared to 34.8 years in Leesburg.
- Leesburg has a higher median income of $132,298 compared to $41,250 in Taylorsville.
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 41.0% in Leesburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Taylorsville at 10%, compared to 6% in Leesburg.
- Taylorsville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.8% in Leesburg.
Demographics
Demographics Leesburg vs Taylorsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Leesburg | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
Black | 10 | 1 |
White | 50 | 82 |
Asian | 10 | 3 |
Hispanic | 17 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 7 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Leesburg vs Taylorsville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Leesburg at 10% compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Taylorsville at 82% compared to 50% in Leesburg.
- The Asian population is larger in Leesburg at 10% compared to 3% in Taylorsville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Leesburg at 17% compared to 7% in Taylorsville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Leesburg at 12% compared to 7% in Taylorsville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Leesburg at 1% compared to 0% in Taylorsville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Leesburg | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 17.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 12.0% |
Depression | 18.6% | 24.1% |
Smoking | 10.7% | 17.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 33.4% | 32.5% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 40.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Leesburg vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 14.1% in Leesburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Taylorsville at 24.1% versus 18.6% in Leesburg.
- Taylorsville has a higher smoking rate at 17.8% compared to 10.7% in Leesburg.
- Binge drinking is more common in Leesburg at 17.7% compared to 17.0% in Taylorsville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Leesburg at 33.4% compared to 32.5% in Taylorsville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Taylorsville at 40.0% compared to 7.0% in Leesburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Leesburg | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (376) | 0.8% (2) |
High School Diploma | 8.6% (4,195) | 24.8% (64) |
Less than High School | 7.4% (3,619) | 51.2% (132) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.0% (17,628) | 22.5% (58) |
Education Levels Comparison: Leesburg vs Taylorsville
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Leesburg and Taylorsville at 0.8%.
- In Taylorsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.8% compared to 8.6% in Leesburg.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Taylorsville at 51.2%, compared to 7.4% in Leesburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Leesburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 22.5% in Taylorsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.