Demographics details for Leesburg, FL vs Protem, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Leesburg, FL vs Protem, MO.
| Data | Leesburg | Protem |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,178 | 408 |
| Median Age | 43.6 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $43,733 | $40,000 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Leesburg vs Protem
- In Leesburg, the population is higher at 29,178, compared to 408 in Protem.
- Residents in Leesburg have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 42.0 years in Protem.
- Leesburg has a higher median income of $43,733 compared to $40,000 in Protem.
- In Protem, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 35.0% in Leesburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Protem at 12%, compared to 11% in Leesburg.
- Protem has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.4% in Leesburg.
Demographics
Demographics Leesburg vs Protem provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Leesburg | Protem |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | 3 |
| White | 46 | 95 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 24 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Leesburg vs Protem
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Leesburg at 19% compared to 3% in Protem.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Protem at 95% compared to 46% in Leesburg.
- The Asian population is larger in Leesburg at 1% compared to 0% in Protem.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Leesburg at 24% compared to 2% in Protem.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Leesburg at 10% compared to 0% in Protem.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Leesburg and Protem at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Leesburg | Protem |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 21.1% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 23.6% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 39.8% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Leesburg vs Protem
- More residents in Leesburg report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Protem.
- Depression is more prevalent in Leesburg at 21.1% compared to 0.0% in Protem.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Leesburg at 23.6% compared to 0.0% in Protem.
- Binge drinking is more common in Leesburg at 14.3% compared to 0.0% in Protem.
- Obesity rates are higher in Leesburg at 39.8% compared to 0.0% in Protem.
- Disability percentages are higher in Leesburg at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Protem.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Leesburg | Protem |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (209) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 21.5% (6,277) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 11.4% (3,340) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (3,428) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Leesburg vs Protem
- A higher percentage of residents in Leesburg have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Protem.
- A higher percentage of residents in Leesburg hold a high school diploma at 21.5% compared to 0.0% in Protem.
- More residents in Leesburg have less than a high school education at 11.4% compared to 0.0% in Protem.
- A higher percentage of residents in Leesburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 0.0% in Protem.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.