Demographics details for Leesburg, FL vs Lexington, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Leesburg, FL vs Lexington, TN.
| Data | Leesburg | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,178 | 7,952 |
| Median Age | 43.6 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $43,733 | $45,877 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Leesburg vs Lexington
- In Leesburg, the population is higher at 29,178, compared to 7,952 in Lexington.
- Residents in Leesburg have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 36.6 years in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher median income of $45,877, compared to $43,733 in Leesburg.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Leesburg and Lexington at 35.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Lexington at 13%, compared to 11% in Leesburg.
- The unemployment rate in Leesburg is higher at 4.4%, compared to 4.2% in Lexington.
Demographics
Demographics Leesburg vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Leesburg | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | 17 |
| White | 46 | 81 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 24 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Leesburg vs Lexington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Leesburg at 19% compared to 17% in Lexington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lexington at 81% compared to 46% in Leesburg.
- The Asian population is larger in Leesburg at 1% compared to 0% in Lexington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Leesburg at 24% compared to 1% in Lexington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Leesburg at 10% compared to 1% in Lexington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Leesburg and Lexington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Leesburg | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 21.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 15.3% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 30.4% |
| Smoking | 23.6% | 26.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 39.8% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Leesburg vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.6% compared to 18.0% in Leesburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lexington at 30.4% versus 21.1% in Leesburg.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 26.1% compared to 23.6% in Leesburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lexington at 14.4% compared to 14.3% in Leesburg.
- Lexington has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 39.8% in Leesburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Leesburg at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Lexington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Leesburg | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (209) | 0.4% (29) |
| High School Diploma | 21.5% (6,277) | 22.4% (1,783) |
| Less than High School | 11.4% (3,340) | 14.6% (1,159) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (3,428) | 9.3% (740) |
Education Levels Comparison: Leesburg vs Lexington
- A higher percentage of residents in Leesburg have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Lexington.
- In Lexington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.4% compared to 21.5% in Leesburg.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 14.6%, compared to 11.4% in Leesburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Leesburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 9.3% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.