Demographics details for Lees summit, MO vs Giddings, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lees summit, MO vs Giddings, TX.

Data Lees summit Giddings
Population 103,465 5,129
Median Age 38.6 years 40.2 years
Median Income $103,447 $63,529
Married Families 45.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 5% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.3 5.1

Population Comparison: Lees summit vs Giddings

  • In Lees summit, the population is higher at 103,465, compared to 5,129 in Giddings.
  • The median age in Giddings is higher at 40.2 years, compared to 38.6 years in Lees summit.
  • Lees summit has a higher median income of $103,447 compared to $63,529 in Giddings.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Lees summit at 45.0% compared to 34.0% in Giddings.
  • The poverty level is higher in Giddings at 10%, compared to 5% in Lees summit.
  • Giddings has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.3% in Lees summit.

Demographics

Demographics Lees summit vs Giddings provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lees summit Giddings
Black 9 11
White 78 24
Asian 2 1
Hispanic 5 48
Two or More Races 6 12
American Indian Data is updating 4

Demographics Comparison: Lees summit vs Giddings

  • In Giddings, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 9% in Lees summit.
  • Lees summit has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 24% in Giddings.
  • The Asian population is larger in Lees summit at 2% compared to 1% in Giddings.
  • Giddings has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 48%, compared to 5% in Lees summit.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Giddings at 12%, compared to 6% in Lees summit.
  • In Giddings, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Lees summit.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lees summit Giddings
Mental Health Not Good 16.0% 18.6%
Physical Health Not Good 9.2% 14.0%
Depression 21.8% 23.2%
Smoking 13.1% 19.6%
Binge Drinking 21.7% 16.8%
Obesity 33.2% 40.0%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lees summit vs Giddings

  • In Giddings, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 16.0% in Lees summit.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Giddings at 23.2% versus 21.8% in Lees summit.
  • Giddings has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 13.1% in Lees summit.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lees summit at 21.7% compared to 16.8% in Giddings.
  • Giddings has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 33.2% in Lees summit.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Giddings at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Lees summit.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lees summit Giddings
No Schooling 0.3% (298) 1.0% (53)
High School Diploma 11.1% (11,521) 26.1% (1,341)
Less than High School 3.2% (3,308) 22.3% (1,143)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 32.3% (33,401) 8.8% (453)

Education Levels Comparison: Lees summit vs Giddings

  • In Giddings, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.3% in Lees summit.
  • In Giddings, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.1% compared to 11.1% in Lees summit.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Giddings at 22.3%, compared to 3.2% in Lees summit.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lees summit hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.3% compared to 8.8% in Giddings.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.