Demographics details for Lebanon, MO vs Forest park, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lebanon, MO vs Forest park, GA.
| Data | Lebanon | Forest park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,232 | 19,400 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 31.3 years |
| Median Income | $45,634 | $41,837 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Lebanon vs Forest park
- The population in Forest park is higher at 19,400, compared to 15,232 in Lebanon.
- Residents in Lebanon have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 31.3 years in Forest park.
- Lebanon has a higher median income of $45,634 compared to $41,837 in Forest park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lebanon at 33.0% compared to 23.0% in Forest park.
- Lebanon has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Forest park.
- Forest park has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Lebanon.
Demographics
Demographics Lebanon vs Forest park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lebanon | Forest park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 55 |
| White | 87 | 8 |
| Asian | 1 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lebanon vs Forest park
- In Forest park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 55% compared to 1% in Lebanon.
- Lebanon has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 8% in Forest park.
- In Forest park, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Lebanon.
- Forest park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 4% in Lebanon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Forest park at 8%, compared to 6% in Lebanon.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lebanon at 1% compared to 0% in Forest park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lebanon | Forest park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 16.0% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 23.6% | 22.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 13.3% |
| Obesity | 38.8% | 43.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lebanon vs Forest park
- More residents in Lebanon report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.3% in Forest park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lebanon at 24.9% compared to 17.8% in Forest park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lebanon at 23.6% compared to 22.7% in Forest park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lebanon at 16.5% compared to 13.3% in Forest park.
- Forest park has higher obesity rates at 43.0% compared to 38.8% in Lebanon.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lebanon at 19.0% compared to 15.0% in Forest park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lebanon | Forest park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (90) | 2.6% (504) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (2,870) | 18.4% (3,567) |
| Less than High School | 18.3% (2,795) | 21.7% (4,202) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.2% (1,707) | 6.4% (1,235) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lebanon vs Forest park
- In Forest park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.6% in Lebanon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lebanon hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 18.4% in Forest park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Forest park at 21.7%, compared to 18.3% in Lebanon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lebanon hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.2% compared to 6.4% in Forest park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.