Demographics details for Leavenworth, WA vs Union, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Leavenworth, WA vs Union, IL.
| Data | Leavenworth | Union |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,422 | 16,767 |
| Median Age | 40.9 years | 44.7 years |
| Median Income | $66,042 | $54,090 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Leavenworth vs Union
- The population in Union is higher at 16,767, compared to 2,422 in Leavenworth.
- The median age in Union is higher at 44.7 years, compared to 40.9 years in Leavenworth.
- Leavenworth has a higher median income of $66,042 compared to $54,090 in Union.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Leavenworth at 48.0% compared to 41.0% in Union.
- Leavenworth has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 6% in Union.
- Union has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 4.5% in Leavenworth.
Demographics
Demographics Leavenworth vs Union provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Leavenworth | Union |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 87 | 87 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Leavenworth vs Union
- In Union, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Leavenworth.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Leavenworth and Union at 87%.
- The Asian population is larger in Leavenworth at 1% compared to 0% in Union.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Leavenworth at 7% compared to 5% in Union.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Union at 6%, compared to 4% in Leavenworth.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Leavenworth and Union at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Leavenworth | Union |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 26.5% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 12.1% | 19.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 28.2% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Leavenworth vs Union
- In Union, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.2% in Leavenworth.
- Depression is more prevalent in Leavenworth at 26.5% compared to 22.6% in Union.
- Union has a higher smoking rate at 19.4% compared to 12.1% in Leavenworth.
- Binge drinking is more common in Leavenworth at 18.9% compared to 17.3% in Union.
- Union has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 28.2% in Leavenworth.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union at 19.0% compared to 15.0% in Leavenworth.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Leavenworth | Union |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (5) | 1.3% (215) |
| High School Diploma | 11.3% (273) | 20.2% (3,386) |
| Less than High School | 9.0% (218) | 17.5% (2,940) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.2% (876) | 16.0% (2,690) |
Education Levels Comparison: Leavenworth vs Union
- In Union, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.2% in Leavenworth.
- In Union, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 11.3% in Leavenworth.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Union at 17.5%, compared to 9.0% in Leavenworth.
- A higher percentage of residents in Leavenworth hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.2% compared to 16.0% in Union.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.