Demographics details for Leavenworth, WA vs Butler, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Leavenworth, WA vs Butler, PA.
| Data | Leavenworth | Butler |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,422 | 13,176 |
| Median Age | 40.9 years | 38.2 years |
| Median Income | $66,042 | $39,546 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Leavenworth vs Butler
- The population in Butler is higher at 13,176, compared to 2,422 in Leavenworth.
- Residents in Leavenworth have a higher median age of 40.9 years compared to 38.2 years in Butler.
- Leavenworth has a higher median income of $66,042 compared to $39,546 in Butler.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Leavenworth at 48.0% compared to 26.0% in Butler.
- The poverty level is higher in Butler at 12%, compared to 7% in Leavenworth.
- The unemployment rate in Leavenworth is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Butler.
Demographics
Demographics Leavenworth vs Butler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Leavenworth | Butler |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 87 | 88 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Leavenworth vs Butler
- In Butler, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Leavenworth.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Butler at 88% compared to 87% in Leavenworth.
- Both Leavenworth and Butler have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Leavenworth at 7% compared to 3% in Butler.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Butler at 5%, compared to 4% in Leavenworth.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Leavenworth and Butler at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Leavenworth | Butler |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 14.5% |
| Depression | 26.5% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 12.1% | 24.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 28.2% | 38.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Leavenworth vs Butler
- In Butler, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.2% in Leavenworth.
- Depression is more prevalent in Leavenworth at 26.5% compared to 24.4% in Butler.
- Butler has a higher smoking rate at 24.6% compared to 12.1% in Leavenworth.
- Binge drinking is more common in Leavenworth at 18.9% compared to 17.4% in Butler.
- Butler has higher obesity rates at 38.2% compared to 28.2% in Leavenworth.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Butler at 23.0% compared to 15.0% in Leavenworth.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Leavenworth | Butler |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (5) | 0.1% (14) |
| High School Diploma | 11.3% (273) | 23.6% (3,115) |
| Less than High School | 9.0% (218) | 9.3% (1,222) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.2% (876) | 15.6% (2,049) |
Education Levels Comparison: Leavenworth vs Butler
- A higher percentage of residents in Leavenworth have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.1% in Butler.
- In Butler, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.6% compared to 11.3% in Leavenworth.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Butler at 9.3%, compared to 9.0% in Leavenworth.
- A higher percentage of residents in Leavenworth hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.2% compared to 15.6% in Butler.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.