Demographics details for Leander, TX vs Tappahannock, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Leander, TX vs Tappahannock, VA.
| Data | Leander | Tappahannock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 74,375 | 2,192 |
| Median Age | 35.5 years | 48.2 years |
| Median Income | $129,684 | $40,703 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Leander vs Tappahannock
- In Leander, the population is higher at 74,375, compared to 2,192 in Tappahannock.
- The median age in Tappahannock is higher at 48.2 years, compared to 35.5 years in Leander.
- Leander has a higher median income of $129,684 compared to $40,703 in Tappahannock.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Leander at 40.0% compared to 27.0% in Tappahannock.
- The poverty level is higher in Tappahannock at 12%, compared to 5% in Leander.
- The unemployment rate in Leander is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.0% in Tappahannock.
Demographics
Demographics Leander vs Tappahannock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Leander | Tappahannock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 42 |
| White | 57 | 51 |
| Asian | 7 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 20 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Leander vs Tappahannock
- In Tappahannock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 5% in Leander.
- Leander has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 51% in Tappahannock.
- The Asian population is larger in Leander at 7% compared to 1% in Tappahannock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Leander at 20% compared to 2% in Tappahannock.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Leander at 11% compared to 4% in Tappahannock.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Leander and Tappahannock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Leander | Tappahannock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 12.4% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 32.7% | 44.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Leander vs Tappahannock
- In Tappahannock, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 15.7% in Leander.
- Depression is more prevalent in Leander at 24.7% compared to 22.4% in Tappahannock.
- Tappahannock has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 12.4% in Leander.
- Binge drinking is more common in Leander at 17.8% compared to 14.1% in Tappahannock.
- Tappahannock has higher obesity rates at 44.7% compared to 32.7% in Leander.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tappahannock at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Leander.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Leander | Tappahannock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (422) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 7.1% (5,306) | 18.8% (411) |
| Less than High School | 4.3% (3,162) | 8.4% (185) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.4% (19,620) | 14.1% (309) |
Education Levels Comparison: Leander vs Tappahannock
- A higher percentage of residents in Leander have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Tappahannock.
- In Tappahannock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 7.1% in Leander.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tappahannock at 8.4%, compared to 4.3% in Leander.
- A higher percentage of residents in Leander hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.4% compared to 14.1% in Tappahannock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.