Demographics details for Leander, TX vs Swainsboro, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Leander, TX vs Swainsboro, GA.
| Data | Leander | Swainsboro |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 74,375 | 7,583 |
| Median Age | 35.5 years | 30.1 years |
| Median Income | $129,684 | $44,491 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 24% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Leander vs Swainsboro
- In Leander, the population is higher at 74,375, compared to 7,583 in Swainsboro.
- Residents in Leander have a higher median age of 35.5 years compared to 30.1 years in Swainsboro.
- Leander has a higher median income of $129,684 compared to $44,491 in Swainsboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Leander at 40.0% compared to 25.0% in Swainsboro.
- The poverty level is higher in Swainsboro at 24%, compared to 5% in Leander.
- Swainsboro has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.0% in Leander.
Demographics
Demographics Leander vs Swainsboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Leander | Swainsboro |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 57 |
| White | 57 | 33 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 20 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Leander vs Swainsboro
- In Swainsboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 57% compared to 5% in Leander.
- Leander has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 33% in Swainsboro.
- The Asian population is larger in Leander at 7% compared to 0% in Swainsboro.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Leander at 20% compared to 4% in Swainsboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Leander at 11% compared to 6% in Swainsboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Leander and Swainsboro at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Leander | Swainsboro |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 20.6% |
| Smoking | 12.4% | 22.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 32.7% | 42.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Leander vs Swainsboro
- In Swainsboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 15.7% in Leander.
- Depression is more prevalent in Leander at 24.7% compared to 20.6% in Swainsboro.
- Swainsboro has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 12.4% in Leander.
- Binge drinking is more common in Leander at 17.8% compared to 13.6% in Swainsboro.
- Swainsboro has higher obesity rates at 42.6% compared to 32.7% in Leander.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Swainsboro at 24.0% compared to 7.0% in Leander.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Leander | Swainsboro |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (422) | 1.9% (147) |
| High School Diploma | 7.1% (5,306) | 16.7% (1,264) |
| Less than High School | 4.3% (3,162) | 11.6% (879) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.4% (19,620) | 6.6% (500) |
Education Levels Comparison: Leander vs Swainsboro
- In Swainsboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.6% in Leander.
- In Swainsboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 7.1% in Leander.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Swainsboro at 11.6%, compared to 4.3% in Leander.
- A higher percentage of residents in Leander hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.4% compared to 6.6% in Swainsboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.