Demographics details for Leander, TX vs Saint marks, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Leander, TX vs Saint marks, FL.
Data | Leander | Saint marks |
---|---|---|
Population | 74,375 | 295 |
Median Age | 35.5 years | 60.1 years |
Median Income | $129,684 | $47,500 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 51.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Leander vs Saint marks
- In Leander, the population is higher at 74,375, compared to 295 in Saint marks.
- The median age in Saint marks is higher at 60.1 years, compared to 35.5 years in Leander.
- Leander has a higher median income of $129,684 compared to $47,500 in Saint marks.
- In Saint marks, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 40.0% in Leander.
- Leander has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Saint marks.
- Saint marks has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Leander.
Demographics
Demographics Leander vs Saint marks provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Leander | Saint marks |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | Data is updating |
White | 57 | 98 |
Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 20 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 11 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Leander vs Saint marks
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Leander at 5% compared to 0% in Saint marks.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Saint marks at 98% compared to 57% in Leander.
- The Asian population is larger in Leander at 7% compared to 0% in Saint marks.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Leander at 20% compared to 0% in Saint marks.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Leander at 11% compared to 2% in Saint marks.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Leander and Saint marks at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Leander | Saint marks |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 18.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 12.7% |
Depression | 24.7% | 23.2% |
Smoking | 12.4% | 25.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 17.4% |
Obesity | 32.7% | 31.9% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Leander vs Saint marks
- In Saint marks, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.7% in Leander.
- Depression is more prevalent in Leander at 24.7% compared to 23.2% in Saint marks.
- Saint marks has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 12.4% in Leander.
- Binge drinking is more common in Leander at 17.8% compared to 17.4% in Saint marks.
- Obesity rates are higher in Leander at 32.7% compared to 31.9% in Saint marks.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Saint marks at 12.0% compared to 7.0% in Leander.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Leander | Saint marks |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (422) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 7.1% (5,306) | 23.7% (70) |
Less than High School | 4.3% (3,162) | 9.5% (28) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.4% (19,620) | 4.1% (12) |
Education Levels Comparison: Leander vs Saint marks
- A higher percentage of residents in Leander have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Saint marks.
- In Saint marks, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.7% compared to 7.1% in Leander.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Saint marks at 9.5%, compared to 4.3% in Leander.
- A higher percentage of residents in Leander hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.4% compared to 4.1% in Saint marks.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.