Demographics details for Leander, TX vs Overland park, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Leander, TX vs Overland park, KS.
Data | Leander | Overland park |
---|---|---|
Population | 74,375 | 197,726 |
Median Age | 35.5 years | 38.4 years |
Median Income | $129,684 | $100,876 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Leander vs Overland park
- The population in Overland park is higher at 197,726, compared to 74,375 in Leander.
- The median age in Overland park is higher at 38.4 years, compared to 35.5 years in Leander.
- Leander has a higher median income of $129,684 compared to $100,876 in Overland park.
- In Overland park, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 40.0% in Leander.
- The poverty level is higher in Overland park at 6%, compared to 5% in Leander.
- The unemployment rate in Leander is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.3% in Overland park.
Demographics
Demographics Leander vs Overland park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Leander | Overland park |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 5 |
White | 57 | 74 |
Asian | 7 | 9 |
Hispanic | 20 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Leander vs Overland park
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Leander and Overland park at 5%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Overland park at 74% compared to 57% in Leander.
- In Overland park, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 7% in Leander.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Leander at 20% compared to 7% in Overland park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Leander at 11% compared to 5% in Overland park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Leander and Overland park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Leander | Overland park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 12.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 6.9% |
Depression | 24.7% | 18.3% |
Smoking | 12.4% | 9.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 19.7% |
Obesity | 32.7% | 28.6% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Leander vs Overland park
- More residents in Leander report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 12.2% in Overland park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Leander at 24.7% compared to 18.3% in Overland park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Leander at 12.4% compared to 9.6% in Overland park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Overland park at 19.7% compared to 17.8% in Leander.
- Obesity rates are higher in Leander at 32.7% compared to 28.6% in Overland park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Overland park at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Leander.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Leander | Overland park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (422) | 0.5% (897) |
High School Diploma | 7.1% (5,306) | 7.1% (13,953) |
Less than High School | 4.3% (3,162) | 3.3% (6,590) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.4% (19,620) | 43.1% (85,152) |
Education Levels Comparison: Leander vs Overland park
- A higher percentage of residents in Leander have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Overland park.
- Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 7.1%.
- More residents in Leander have less than a high school education at 4.3% compared to 3.3% in Overland park.
- In Overland park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.1% compared to 26.4% in Leander.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.