Demographics details for Leander, TX vs Maple falls, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Leander, TX vs Maple falls, WA.
| Data | Leander | Maple falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 74,375 | 231 |
| Median Age | 35.5 years | 61.4 years |
| Median Income | $129,684 | $32,226 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | Data is updating |
Population Comparison: Leander vs Maple falls
- In Leander, the population is higher at 74,375, compared to 231 in Maple falls.
- The median age in Maple falls is higher at 61.4 years, compared to 35.5 years in Leander.
- Leander has a higher median income of $129,684 compared to $32,226 in Maple falls.
- In Maple falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 40.0% in Leander.
- Leander has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Maple falls.
- The unemployment rate in Leander is higher at 4.0%, compared to 0.0% in Maple falls.
Demographics
Demographics Leander vs Maple falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Leander | Maple falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | Data is updating |
| White | 57 | 94 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 20 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Leander vs Maple falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Leander at 5% compared to 0% in Maple falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Maple falls at 94% compared to 57% in Leander.
- The Asian population is larger in Leander at 7% compared to 0% in Maple falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Leander at 20% compared to 6% in Maple falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Leander at 11% compared to 0% in Maple falls.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Leander and Maple falls at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Leander | Maple falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 31.8% |
| Smoking | 12.4% | 19.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 32.7% | 28.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 68.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Leander vs Maple falls
- In Maple falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 15.7% in Leander.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Maple falls at 31.8% versus 24.7% in Leander.
- Maple falls has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 12.4% in Leander.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Maple falls at 17.9% compared to 17.8% in Leander.
- Obesity rates are higher in Leander at 32.7% compared to 28.1% in Maple falls.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Maple falls at 68.0% compared to 7.0% in Leander.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Leander | Maple falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (422) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 7.1% (5,306) | 40.7% (94) |
| Less than High School | 4.3% (3,162) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.4% (19,620) | 8.7% (20) |
Education Levels Comparison: Leander vs Maple falls
- A higher percentage of residents in Leander have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Maple falls.
- In Maple falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 40.7% compared to 7.1% in Leander.
- More residents in Leander have less than a high school education at 4.3% compared to 0.0% in Maple falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Leander hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.4% compared to 8.7% in Maple falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.