Demographics details for Leander, TX vs Loves park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Leander, TX vs Loves park, IL.
| Data | Leander | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 74,375 | 23,365 |
| Median Age | 35.5 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $129,684 | $56,370 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Leander vs Loves park
- In Leander, the population is higher at 74,375, compared to 23,365 in Loves park.
- The median age in Loves park is higher at 36.6 years, compared to 35.5 years in Leander.
- Leander has a higher median income of $129,684 compared to $56,370 in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Leander at 40.0% compared to 35.0% in Loves park.
- The poverty level is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 5% in Leander.
- The unemployment rate in Leander is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.6% in Loves park.
Demographics
Demographics Leander vs Loves park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Leander | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 7 |
| White | 57 | 71 |
| Asian | 7 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 20 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Leander vs Loves park
- In Loves park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 5% in Leander.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Loves park at 71% compared to 57% in Leander.
- The Asian population is larger in Leander at 7% compared to 3% in Loves park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Leander at 20% compared to 10% in Loves park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Leander at 11% compared to 9% in Loves park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Leander and Loves park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Leander | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 12.4% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 32.7% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Leander vs Loves park
- In Loves park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.7% in Leander.
- Depression is more prevalent in Leander at 24.7% compared to 21.3% in Loves park.
- Loves park has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 12.4% in Leander.
- Binge drinking is more common in Leander at 17.8% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- Loves park has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 32.7% in Leander.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Loves park at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Leander.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Leander | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (422) | 0.4% (97) |
| High School Diploma | 7.1% (5,306) | 17.1% (3,994) |
| Less than High School | 4.3% (3,162) | 9.7% (2,262) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.4% (19,620) | 17.4% (4,064) |
Education Levels Comparison: Leander vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of residents in Leander have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- In Loves park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 7.1% in Leander.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Loves park at 9.7%, compared to 4.3% in Leander.
- A higher percentage of residents in Leander hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.4% compared to 17.4% in Loves park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.