Demographics details for Leander, TX vs London, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Leander, TX vs London, KY.
Data | Leander | London |
---|---|---|
Population | 74,375 | 7,578 |
Median Age | 35.5 years | 39.5 years |
Median Income | $129,684 | $45,858 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Leander vs London
- In Leander, the population is higher at 74,375, compared to 7,578 in London.
- The median age in London is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 35.5 years in Leander.
- Leander has a higher median income of $129,684 compared to $45,858 in London.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Leander at 40.0% compared to 35.0% in London.
- The poverty level is higher in London at 13%, compared to 5% in Leander.
- The unemployment rate in Leander is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.8% in London.
Demographics
Demographics Leander vs London provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Leander | London |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 2 |
White | 57 | 93 |
Asian | 7 | 1 |
Hispanic | 20 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Leander vs London
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Leander at 5% compared to 2% in London.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in London at 93% compared to 57% in Leander.
- The Asian population is larger in Leander at 7% compared to 1% in London.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Leander at 20% compared to 2% in London.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Leander at 11% compared to 2% in London.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Leander and London at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Leander | London |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 20.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 16.0% |
Depression | 24.7% | 29.0% |
Smoking | 12.4% | 24.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 32.7% | 46.7% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Leander vs London
- In London, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 15.7% in Leander.
- Higher depression rates are seen in London at 29.0% versus 24.7% in Leander.
- London has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 12.4% in Leander.
- Binge drinking is more common in Leander at 17.8% compared to 14.8% in London.
- London has higher obesity rates at 46.7% compared to 32.7% in Leander.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in London at 18.0% compared to 7.0% in Leander.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Leander | London |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (422) | 1.2% (93) |
High School Diploma | 7.1% (5,306) | 19.7% (1,496) |
Less than High School | 4.3% (3,162) | 18.6% (1,409) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.4% (19,620) | 11.9% (900) |
Education Levels Comparison: Leander vs London
- In London, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Leander.
- In London, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.7% compared to 7.1% in Leander.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in London at 18.6%, compared to 4.3% in Leander.
- A higher percentage of residents in Leander hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.4% compared to 11.9% in London.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.