Demographics details for Leander, TX vs Fair oaks, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Leander, TX vs Fair oaks, CA.
| Data | Leander | Fair oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 74,375 | 32,754 |
| Median Age | 35.5 years | 45.7 years |
| Median Income | $129,684 | $112,138 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Leander vs Fair oaks
- In Leander, the population is higher at 74,375, compared to 32,754 in Fair oaks.
- The median age in Fair oaks is higher at 45.7 years, compared to 35.5 years in Leander.
- Leander has a higher median income of $129,684 compared to $112,138 in Fair oaks.
- In Fair oaks, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 40.0% in Leander.
- The poverty level is higher in Fair oaks at 6%, compared to 5% in Leander.
- Fair oaks has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Leander.
Demographics
Demographics Leander vs Fair oaks provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Leander | Fair oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 2 |
| White | 57 | 68 |
| Asian | 7 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 20 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Leander vs Fair oaks
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Leander at 5% compared to 2% in Fair oaks.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fair oaks at 68% compared to 57% in Leander.
- The Asian population is larger in Leander at 7% compared to 5% in Fair oaks.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Leander at 20% compared to 14% in Fair oaks.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Leander at 11% compared to 10% in Fair oaks.
- In Fair oaks, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Leander.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Leander | Fair oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 9.3% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 20.3% |
| Smoking | 12.4% | 10.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 32.7% | 29.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Leander vs Fair oaks
- More residents in Leander report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 15.6% in Fair oaks.
- Depression is more prevalent in Leander at 24.7% compared to 20.3% in Fair oaks.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Leander at 12.4% compared to 10.6% in Fair oaks.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Leander and Fair oaks at 17.8%.
- Obesity rates are higher in Leander at 32.7% compared to 29.9% in Fair oaks.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fair oaks at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Leander.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Leander | Fair oaks |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (422) | 1.0% (312) |
| High School Diploma | 7.1% (5,306) | 9.5% (3,112) |
| Less than High School | 4.3% (3,162) | 4.9% (1,601) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.4% (19,620) | 35.4% (11,579) |
Education Levels Comparison: Leander vs Fair oaks
- In Fair oaks, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.6% in Leander.
- In Fair oaks, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.5% compared to 7.1% in Leander.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fair oaks at 4.9%, compared to 4.3% in Leander.
- In Fair oaks, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 26.4% in Leander.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.