Demographics details for Le grand, CA vs Spanish fork, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Le grand, CA vs Spanish fork, UT.
Data | Le grand | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,679 | 44,102 |
Median Age | 32.2 years | 27.4 years |
Median Income | $56,563 | $93,989 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 7.2 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Le grand vs Spanish fork
- The population in Spanish fork is higher at 44,102, compared to 1,679 in Le grand.
- Residents in Le grand have a higher median age of 32.2 years compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989, compared to $56,563 in Le grand.
- In Spanish fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 34.0% in Le grand.
- Le grand has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
- The unemployment rate in Le grand is higher at 7.2%, compared to 3.8% in Spanish fork.
Demographics
Demographics Le grand vs Spanish fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Le grand | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 5 | 80 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 85 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Le grand vs Spanish fork
- In Spanish fork, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Le grand.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Spanish fork at 80% compared to 5% in Le grand.
- The Asian population is larger in Le grand at 1% compared to 0% in Spanish fork.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Le grand at 85% compared to 12% in Spanish fork.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Le grand at 8% compared to 7% in Spanish fork.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Le grand at 1% compared to 0% in Spanish fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Le grand | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | 10.8% |
Depression | 18.9% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 15.4% | 7.7% |
Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 8.3% |
Obesity | 35.5% | 31.0% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Le grand vs Spanish fork
- More residents in Le grand report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 15.0% in Spanish fork.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Spanish fork at 23.8% versus 18.9% in Le grand.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Le grand at 15.4% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Le grand at 14.9% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Le grand at 35.5% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in Le grand at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Le grand | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 6.6% (110) | 0.4% (175) |
High School Diploma | 11.2% (188) | 9.1% (4,010) |
Less than High School | 43.1% (724) | 5.9% (2,583) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (122) | 19.4% (8,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Le grand vs Spanish fork
- A higher percentage of residents in Le grand have no formal schooling at 6.6% compared to 0.4% in Spanish fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Le grand hold a high school diploma at 11.2% compared to 9.1% in Spanish fork.
- More residents in Le grand have less than a high school education at 43.1% compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
- In Spanish fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 7.3% in Le grand.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.