Demographics details for Lawson, MO vs Colton, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lawson, MO vs Colton, CA.
| Data | Lawson | Colton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,525 | 53,918 |
| Median Age | 33.3 years | 33.2 years |
| Median Income | $61,929 | $66,725 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Lawson vs Colton
- The population in Colton is higher at 53,918, compared to 2,525 in Lawson.
- Residents in Lawson have a higher median age of 33.3 years compared to 33.2 years in Colton.
- Colton has a higher median income of $66,725, compared to $61,929 in Lawson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lawson at 39.0% compared to 36.0% in Colton.
- The poverty level is higher in Colton at 19%, compared to 8% in Lawson.
- Colton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.5% in Lawson.
Demographics
Demographics Lawson vs Colton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lawson | Colton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 9 |
| White | 96 | -4 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 73 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lawson vs Colton
- In Colton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Lawson.
- Lawson has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to -4% in Colton.
- In Colton, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Lawson.
- Colton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 73%, compared to 2% in Lawson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Colton at 18%, compared to 2% in Lawson.
- In Colton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lawson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lawson | Colton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 17.3% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 36.0% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lawson vs Colton
- More residents in Lawson report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 16.6% in Colton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lawson at 25.4% compared to 17.3% in Colton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lawson at 21.6% compared to 12.7% in Colton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lawson at 18.3% compared to 14.7% in Colton.
- Colton has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 36.0% in Lawson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Colton at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Lawson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lawson | Colton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (4) | 2.0% (1,094) |
| High School Diploma | 25.5% (643) | 17.2% (9,295) |
| Less than High School | 15.5% (392) | 30.0% (16,167) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.6% (242) | 11.2% (6,058) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lawson vs Colton
- In Colton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.2% in Lawson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawson hold a high school diploma at 25.5% compared to 17.2% in Colton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Colton at 30.0%, compared to 15.5% in Lawson.
- In Colton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.2% compared to 9.6% in Lawson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.