Demographics details for Lawrenceville, PA vs Foster, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lawrenceville, PA vs Foster, OK.
Data | Lawrenceville | Foster |
---|---|---|
Population | 690 | 247 |
Median Age | 36.9 years | 38.8 years |
Median Income | $57,917 | $68,871 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 47.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Foster
- In Lawrenceville, the population is higher at 690, compared to 247 in Foster.
- The median age in Foster is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 36.9 years in Lawrenceville.
- Foster has a higher median income of $68,871, compared to $57,917 in Lawrenceville.
- In Foster, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 33.0% in Lawrenceville.
- The poverty level is identical in both Lawrenceville and Foster at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Lawrenceville is higher at 5.0%, compared to 2.5% in Foster.
Demographics
Demographics Lawrenceville vs Foster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lawrenceville | Foster |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 95 | 73 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 3 | 20 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 7 |
Demographics Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Foster
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Lawrenceville and Foster at 0%.
- Lawrenceville has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 73% in Foster.
- Both Lawrenceville and Foster have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lawrenceville at 2% compared to 0% in Foster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Foster at 20%, compared to 3% in Lawrenceville.
- In Foster, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 7%, compared to 0% in Lawrenceville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lawrenceville | Foster |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 18.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 12.9% |
Depression | 24.7% | 24.7% |
Smoking | 20.7% | 21.6% |
Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 15.3% |
Obesity | 38.5% | 41.9% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Foster
- In Foster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 18.1% in Lawrenceville.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 24.7%.
- Foster has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 20.7% in Lawrenceville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lawrenceville at 18.5% compared to 15.3% in Foster.
- Foster has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 38.5% in Lawrenceville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Foster at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Lawrenceville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lawrenceville | Foster |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 18.0% (124) | 30.4% (75) |
Less than High School | 11.3% (78) | 8.1% (20) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (81) | 22.3% (55) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Foster
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Lawrenceville and Foster at 0.0%.
- In Foster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.4% compared to 18.0% in Lawrenceville.
- More residents in Lawrenceville have less than a high school education at 11.3% compared to 8.1% in Foster.
- In Foster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 11.7% in Lawrenceville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.