Demographics details for Lawrenceville, IL vs Dawson, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lawrenceville, IL vs Dawson, GA.
Data | Lawrenceville | Dawson |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,209 | 30,138 |
Median Age | 37.5 years | 43.9 years |
Median Income | $42,213 | $84,516 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Dawson
- The population in Dawson is higher at 30,138, compared to 4,209 in Lawrenceville.
- The median age in Dawson is higher at 43.9 years, compared to 37.5 years in Lawrenceville.
- Dawson has a higher median income of $84,516, compared to $42,213 in Lawrenceville.
- In Dawson, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 35.0% in Lawrenceville.
- The poverty level is higher in Dawson at 16%, compared to 15% in Lawrenceville.
- The unemployment rate in Lawrenceville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.4% in Dawson.
Demographics
Demographics Lawrenceville vs Dawson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lawrenceville | Dawson |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 1 |
White | 86 | 88 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 5 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Dawson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lawrenceville at 5% compared to 1% in Dawson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Dawson at 88% compared to 86% in Lawrenceville.
- Both Lawrenceville and Dawson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Dawson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Lawrenceville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lawrenceville at 8% compared to 5% in Dawson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lawrenceville and Dawson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lawrenceville | Dawson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 15.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 10.5% |
Depression | 23.9% | 22.1% |
Smoking | 21.3% | 14.7% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 18.3% |
Obesity | 37.5% | 32.5% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Dawson
- More residents in Lawrenceville report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 15.7% in Dawson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lawrenceville at 23.9% compared to 22.1% in Dawson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lawrenceville at 21.3% compared to 14.7% in Dawson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Dawson at 18.3% compared to 17.0% in Lawrenceville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lawrenceville at 37.5% compared to 32.5% in Dawson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lawrenceville at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Dawson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lawrenceville | Dawson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (5) | 1.5% (446) |
High School Diploma | 12.6% (531) | 11.2% (3,376) |
Less than High School | 17.0% (715) | 15.3% (4,610) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.4% (478) | 23.0% (6,943) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Dawson
- In Dawson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.1% in Lawrenceville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrenceville hold a high school diploma at 12.6% compared to 11.2% in Dawson.
- More residents in Lawrenceville have less than a high school education at 17.0% compared to 15.3% in Dawson.
- In Dawson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 11.4% in Lawrenceville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.