Demographics details for Lawrenceville, IL vs Coleman, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lawrenceville, IL vs Coleman, OK.
| Data | Lawrenceville | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,209 | 297 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $42,213 | $45,938 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Coleman
- In Lawrenceville, the population is higher at 4,209, compared to 297 in Coleman.
- The median age in Coleman is higher at 39.7 years, compared to 37.5 years in Lawrenceville.
- Coleman has a higher median income of $45,938, compared to $42,213 in Lawrenceville.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Lawrenceville and Coleman at 35.0%.
- Lawrenceville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Coleman.
- The unemployment rate in Lawrenceville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Coleman.
Demographics
Demographics Lawrenceville vs Coleman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lawrenceville | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 2 |
| White | 86 | 77 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 11 |
Demographics Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Coleman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lawrenceville at 5% compared to 2% in Coleman.
- Lawrenceville has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 77% in Coleman.
- The Asian population is larger in Lawrenceville at 1% compared to 0% in Coleman.
- Coleman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Lawrenceville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coleman at 9%, compared to 8% in Lawrenceville.
- In Coleman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 11%, compared to 0% in Lawrenceville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lawrenceville | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 26.9% |
| Smoking | 21.3% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 37.5% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 29.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Coleman
- In Coleman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 18.5% in Lawrenceville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Coleman at 26.9% versus 23.9% in Lawrenceville.
- Coleman has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 21.3% in Lawrenceville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lawrenceville at 17.0% compared to 14.8% in Coleman.
- Coleman has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 37.5% in Lawrenceville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Coleman at 29.0% compared to 18.0% in Lawrenceville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lawrenceville | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (5) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.6% (531) | 28.6% (85) |
| Less than High School | 17.0% (715) | 4.0% (12) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.4% (478) | 11.1% (33) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Coleman
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrenceville have no formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Coleman.
- In Coleman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.6% compared to 12.6% in Lawrenceville.
- More residents in Lawrenceville have less than a high school education at 17.0% compared to 4.0% in Coleman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrenceville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.4% compared to 11.1% in Coleman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.