Demographics details for Lawrenceville, GA vs Clemmons, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lawrenceville, GA vs Clemmons, NC.
Data | Lawrenceville | Clemmons |
---|---|---|
Population | 30,588 | 21,823 |
Median Age | 32.5 years | 42.4 years |
Median Income | $55,608 | $75,667 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Clemmons
- In Lawrenceville, the population is higher at 30,588, compared to 21,823 in Clemmons.
- The median age in Clemmons is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 32.5 years in Lawrenceville.
- Clemmons has a higher median income of $75,667, compared to $55,608 in Lawrenceville.
- In Clemmons, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 35.0% in Lawrenceville.
- Lawrenceville has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Clemmons.
- The unemployment rate in Lawrenceville is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.5% in Clemmons.
Demographics
Demographics Lawrenceville vs Clemmons provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lawrenceville | Clemmons |
---|---|---|
Black | 35 | 6 |
White | 23 | 76 |
Asian | 8 | 5 |
Hispanic | 23 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Clemmons
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lawrenceville at 35% compared to 6% in Clemmons.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clemmons at 76% compared to 23% in Lawrenceville.
- The Asian population is larger in Lawrenceville at 8% compared to 5% in Clemmons.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lawrenceville at 23% compared to 6% in Clemmons.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lawrenceville at 10% compared to 6% in Clemmons.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lawrenceville and Clemmons at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lawrenceville | Clemmons |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 13.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 8.8% |
Depression | 18.7% | 23.7% |
Smoking | 16.4% | 12.5% |
Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 17.8% |
Obesity | 34.9% | 29.7% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Clemmons
- More residents in Lawrenceville report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 13.9% in Clemmons.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clemmons at 23.7% versus 18.7% in Lawrenceville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lawrenceville at 16.4% compared to 12.5% in Clemmons.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clemmons at 17.8% compared to 13.6% in Lawrenceville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lawrenceville at 34.9% compared to 29.7% in Clemmons.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lawrenceville at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Clemmons.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lawrenceville | Clemmons |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (470) | 0.6% (140) |
High School Diploma | 15.6% (4,765) | 9.3% (2,040) |
Less than High School | 14.1% (4,311) | 6.5% (1,429) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (4,767) | 34.0% (7,418) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Clemmons
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrenceville have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.6% in Clemmons.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrenceville hold a high school diploma at 15.6% compared to 9.3% in Clemmons.
- More residents in Lawrenceville have less than a high school education at 14.1% compared to 6.5% in Clemmons.
- In Clemmons, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.0% compared to 15.6% in Lawrenceville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.