Demographics details for Lawrenceville, GA vs Clayton, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lawrenceville, GA vs Clayton, NC.
| Data | Lawrenceville | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,588 | 29,445 |
| Median Age | 32.5 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $55,608 | $71,698 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Clayton
- In Lawrenceville, the population is higher at 30,588, compared to 29,445 in Clayton.
- The median age in Clayton is higher at 32.6 years, compared to 32.5 years in Lawrenceville.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $71,698, compared to $55,608 in Lawrenceville.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Lawrenceville and Clayton at 35.0%.
- Lawrenceville has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Clayton.
- The unemployment rate in Lawrenceville is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.7% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Lawrenceville vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lawrenceville | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 35 | 22 |
| White | 23 | 59 |
| Asian | 8 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lawrenceville at 35% compared to 22% in Clayton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clayton at 59% compared to 23% in Lawrenceville.
- The Asian population is larger in Lawrenceville at 8% compared to 1% in Clayton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lawrenceville at 23% compared to 13% in Clayton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lawrenceville at 10% compared to 5% in Clayton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lawrenceville at 1% compared to 0% in Clayton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lawrenceville | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 18.7% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Clayton
- More residents in Lawrenceville report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 15.6% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 23.1% versus 18.7% in Lawrenceville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lawrenceville at 16.4% compared to 15.2% in Clayton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clayton at 17.6% compared to 13.6% in Lawrenceville.
- Clayton has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 34.9% in Lawrenceville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lawrenceville at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lawrenceville | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (470) | 0.7% (210) |
| High School Diploma | 15.6% (4,765) | 12.6% (3,700) |
| Less than High School | 14.1% (4,311) | 5.4% (1,598) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (4,767) | 18.6% (5,471) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrenceville have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.7% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrenceville hold a high school diploma at 15.6% compared to 12.6% in Clayton.
- More residents in Lawrenceville have less than a high school education at 14.1% compared to 5.4% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 15.6% in Lawrenceville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.