Demographics details for Lawrenceville, GA vs Charleston, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lawrenceville, GA vs Charleston, SC.
Data | Lawrenceville | Charleston |
---|---|---|
Population | 30,588 | 153,672 |
Median Age | 32.5 years | 36.3 years |
Median Income | $55,608 | $83,891 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Charleston
- The population in Charleston is higher at 153,672, compared to 30,588 in Lawrenceville.
- The median age in Charleston is higher at 36.3 years, compared to 32.5 years in Lawrenceville.
- Charleston has a higher median income of $83,891, compared to $55,608 in Lawrenceville.
- In Charleston, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 35.0% in Lawrenceville.
- The poverty level is higher in Charleston at 12%, compared to 8% in Lawrenceville.
- The unemployment rate in Lawrenceville is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.8% in Charleston.
Demographics
Demographics Lawrenceville vs Charleston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lawrenceville | Charleston |
---|---|---|
Black | 35 | 18 |
White | 23 | 71 |
Asian | 8 | 2 |
Hispanic | 23 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Charleston
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lawrenceville at 35% compared to 18% in Charleston.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Charleston at 71% compared to 23% in Lawrenceville.
- The Asian population is larger in Lawrenceville at 8% compared to 2% in Charleston.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lawrenceville at 23% compared to 5% in Charleston.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lawrenceville at 10% compared to 4% in Charleston.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lawrenceville at 1% compared to 0% in Charleston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lawrenceville | Charleston |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 15.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 9.4% |
Depression | 18.7% | 19.6% |
Smoking | 16.4% | 13.0% |
Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 23.0% |
Obesity | 34.9% | 31.8% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Charleston
- More residents in Lawrenceville report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 15.6% in Charleston.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Charleston at 19.6% versus 18.7% in Lawrenceville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lawrenceville at 16.4% compared to 13.0% in Charleston.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Charleston at 23.0% compared to 13.6% in Lawrenceville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lawrenceville at 34.9% compared to 31.8% in Charleston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lawrenceville at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Charleston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lawrenceville | Charleston |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (470) | 0.4% (646) |
High School Diploma | 15.6% (4,765) | 9.1% (13,959) |
Less than High School | 14.1% (4,311) | 4.3% (6,655) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (4,767) | 39.9% (61,263) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lawrenceville vs Charleston
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrenceville have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.4% in Charleston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrenceville hold a high school diploma at 15.6% compared to 9.1% in Charleston.
- More residents in Lawrenceville have less than a high school education at 14.1% compared to 4.3% in Charleston.
- In Charleston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.9% compared to 15.6% in Lawrenceville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.