Demographics details for Lawrence, MA vs Selma, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lawrence, MA vs Selma, CA.
| Data | Lawrence | Selma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 87,954 | 24,430 |
| Median Age | 31.5 years | 31.3 years |
| Median Income | $53,977 | $53,874 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.1 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Lawrence vs Selma
- In Lawrence, the population is higher at 87,954, compared to 24,430 in Selma.
- Residents in Lawrence have a higher median age of 31.5 years compared to 31.3 years in Selma.
- Lawrence has a higher median income of $53,977 compared to $53,874 in Selma.
- In Selma, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 26.0% in Lawrence.
- The poverty level is higher in Selma at 20%, compared to 15% in Lawrence.
- The unemployment rate in Lawrence is higher at 7.1%, compared to 6.5% in Selma.
Demographics
Demographics Lawrence vs Selma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lawrence | Selma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 1 |
| White | -4 | -2 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 82 | 84 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lawrence vs Selma
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lawrence at 5% compared to 1% in Selma.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Selma at -2% compared to -4% in Lawrence.
- In Selma, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Lawrence.
- Selma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 84%, compared to 82% in Lawrence.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lawrence at 15% compared to 13% in Selma.
- In Selma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lawrence.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lawrence | Selma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 22.4% | 17.4% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 15.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 40.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lawrence vs Selma
- More residents in Lawrence report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 18.0% in Selma.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lawrence at 22.4% compared to 17.4% in Selma.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lawrence at 17.3% compared to 15.7% in Selma.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lawrence at 14.5% compared to 13.6% in Selma.
- Selma has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 37.4% in Lawrence.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lawrence at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Selma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lawrence | Selma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (2,366) | 3.8% (938) |
| High School Diploma | 18.6% (16,316) | 14.6% (3,577) |
| Less than High School | 34.1% (29,963) | 33.9% (8,285) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (8,067) | 7.0% (1,712) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lawrence vs Selma
- In Selma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.8% compared to 2.7% in Lawrence.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrence hold a high school diploma at 18.6% compared to 14.6% in Selma.
- More residents in Lawrence have less than a high school education at 34.1% compared to 33.9% in Selma.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrence hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.2% compared to 7.0% in Selma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.