Demographics details for Lawrence, MA vs Gloverville, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lawrence, MA vs Gloverville, SC.
| Data | Lawrence | Gloverville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 87,954 | 3,099 |
| Median Age | 31.5 years | 31.4 years |
| Median Income | $53,977 | $46,643 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Lawrence vs Gloverville
- In Lawrence, the population is higher at 87,954, compared to 3,099 in Gloverville.
- Residents in Lawrence have a higher median age of 31.5 years compared to 31.4 years in Gloverville.
- Lawrence has a higher median income of $53,977 compared to $46,643 in Gloverville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lawrence at 26.0% compared to 20.0% in Gloverville.
- Lawrence has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Gloverville.
- The unemployment rate in Lawrence is higher at 7.1%, compared to 4.5% in Gloverville.
Demographics
Demographics Lawrence vs Gloverville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lawrence | Gloverville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 18 |
| White | -4 | 76 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 82 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lawrence vs Gloverville
- In Gloverville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 5% in Lawrence.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gloverville at 76% compared to -4% in Lawrence.
- The Asian population is larger in Lawrence at 2% compared to 0% in Gloverville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lawrence at 82% compared to 6% in Gloverville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lawrence at 15% compared to 0% in Gloverville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lawrence and Gloverville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lawrence | Gloverville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 20.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 15.8% |
| Depression | 22.4% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 25.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lawrence vs Gloverville
- In Gloverville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 18.9% in Lawrence.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gloverville at 24.7% versus 22.4% in Lawrence.
- Gloverville has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 17.3% in Lawrence.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gloverville at 16.1% compared to 14.5% in Lawrence.
- Gloverville has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 37.4% in Lawrence.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gloverville at 24.0% compared to 14.0% in Lawrence.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lawrence | Gloverville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (2,366) | 0.8% (25) |
| High School Diploma | 18.6% (16,316) | 29.9% (927) |
| Less than High School | 34.1% (29,963) | 19.7% (610) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (8,067) | 4.3% (134) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lawrence vs Gloverville
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrence have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.8% in Gloverville.
- In Gloverville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.9% compared to 18.6% in Lawrence.
- More residents in Lawrence have less than a high school education at 34.1% compared to 19.7% in Gloverville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrence hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.2% compared to 4.3% in Gloverville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.