Demographics details for Lawrence, MA vs Farmington, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lawrence, MA vs Farmington, MN.
| Data | Lawrence | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 87,954 | 23,566 |
| Median Age | 31.5 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $53,977 | $114,737 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.1 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Lawrence vs Farmington
- In Lawrence, the population is higher at 87,954, compared to 23,566 in Farmington.
- The median age in Farmington is higher at 35.1 years, compared to 31.5 years in Lawrence.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $114,737, compared to $53,977 in Lawrence.
- In Farmington, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 26.0% in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Farmington.
- The unemployment rate in Lawrence is higher at 7.1%, compared to 3.2% in Farmington.
Demographics
Demographics Lawrence vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lawrence | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 3 |
| White | -4 | 85 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 82 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lawrence vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lawrence at 5% compared to 3% in Farmington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington at 85% compared to -4% in Lawrence.
- In Farmington, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Lawrence.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lawrence at 82% compared to 5% in Farmington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lawrence at 15% compared to 4% in Farmington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lawrence and Farmington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lawrence | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 13.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 8.2% |
| Depression | 22.4% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 13.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 31.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lawrence vs Farmington
- More residents in Lawrence report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 13.3% in Farmington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Farmington at 22.6% versus 22.4% in Lawrence.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lawrence at 17.3% compared to 13.7% in Farmington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Farmington at 18.9% compared to 14.5% in Lawrence.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lawrence at 37.4% compared to 31.8% in Farmington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lawrence at 14.0% compared to 6.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lawrence | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (2,366) | 0.4% (86) |
| High School Diploma | 18.6% (16,316) | 11.3% (2,674) |
| Less than High School | 34.1% (29,963) | 7.1% (1,662) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (8,067) | 23.4% (5,505) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lawrence vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrence have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.4% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrence hold a high school diploma at 18.6% compared to 11.3% in Farmington.
- More residents in Lawrence have less than a high school education at 34.1% compared to 7.1% in Farmington.
- In Farmington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 9.2% in Lawrence.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.