Demographics details for Lawrence, KS vs Goose creek, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lawrence, KS vs Goose creek, SC.
| Data | Lawrence | Goose creek |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 95,794 | 47,618 |
| Median Age | 28.8 years | 32.0 years |
| Median Income | $59,834 | $84,041 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Lawrence vs Goose creek
- In Lawrence, the population is higher at 95,794, compared to 47,618 in Goose creek.
- The median age in Goose creek is higher at 32.0 years, compared to 28.8 years in Lawrence.
- Goose creek has a higher median income of $84,041, compared to $59,834 in Lawrence.
- In Goose creek, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 32.0% in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Goose creek.
- Goose creek has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.9% in Lawrence.
Demographics
Demographics Lawrence vs Goose creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lawrence | Goose creek |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 20 |
| White | 71 | 63 |
| Asian | 6 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 6 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lawrence vs Goose creek
- In Goose creek, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 5% in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 63% in Goose creek.
- The Asian population is larger in Lawrence at 6% compared to 3% in Goose creek.
- Goose creek has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 7% in Lawrence.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lawrence at 9% compared to 6% in Goose creek.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lawrence at 2% compared to 0% in Goose creek.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lawrence | Goose creek |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 19.2% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 15.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 32.8% | 38.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lawrence vs Goose creek
- In Goose creek, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 16.5% in Lawrence.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lawrence at 22.3% compared to 19.2% in Goose creek.
- Goose creek has a higher smoking rate at 15.8% compared to 14.8% in Lawrence.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lawrence at 19.6% compared to 19.4% in Goose creek.
- Goose creek has higher obesity rates at 38.3% compared to 32.8% in Lawrence.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Goose creek at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Lawrence.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lawrence | Goose creek |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (466) | 0.5% (235) |
| High School Diploma | 8.2% (7,882) | 12.6% (6,002) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (3,784) | 6.9% (3,266) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.1% (29,776) | 16.2% (7,733) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lawrence vs Goose creek
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Lawrence and Goose creek at 0.5%.
- In Goose creek, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.6% compared to 8.2% in Lawrence.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Goose creek at 6.9%, compared to 4.0% in Lawrence.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrence hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 16.2% in Goose creek.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.