Demographics details for Lawrence, KS vs Curwensville, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lawrence, KS vs Curwensville, PA.
Data | Lawrence | Curwensville |
---|---|---|
Population | 95,794 | 2,532 |
Median Age | 28.8 years | 38.9 years |
Median Income | $59,834 | $46,726 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Lawrence vs Curwensville
- In Lawrence, the population is higher at 95,794, compared to 2,532 in Curwensville.
- The median age in Curwensville is higher at 38.9 years, compared to 28.8 years in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher median income of $59,834 compared to $46,726 in Curwensville.
- In Curwensville, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 32.0% in Lawrence.
- The poverty level is identical in both Lawrence and Curwensville at 12%.
- Curwensville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.9% in Lawrence.
Demographics
Demographics Lawrence vs Curwensville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lawrence | Curwensville |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 1 |
White | 71 | 95 |
Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 3 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lawrence vs Curwensville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lawrence at 5% compared to 1% in Curwensville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Curwensville at 95% compared to 71% in Lawrence.
- The Asian population is larger in Lawrence at 6% compared to 0% in Curwensville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lawrence at 7% compared to 1% in Curwensville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lawrence at 9% compared to 3% in Curwensville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lawrence at 2% compared to 0% in Curwensville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lawrence | Curwensville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 18.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 12.5% |
Depression | 22.3% | 23.9% |
Smoking | 14.8% | 21.6% |
Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 18.4% |
Obesity | 32.8% | 37.1% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lawrence vs Curwensville
- In Curwensville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 16.5% in Lawrence.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Curwensville at 23.9% versus 22.3% in Lawrence.
- Curwensville has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 14.8% in Lawrence.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lawrence at 19.6% compared to 18.4% in Curwensville.
- Curwensville has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 32.8% in Lawrence.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Curwensville at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Lawrence.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lawrence | Curwensville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (466) | 0.5% (12) |
High School Diploma | 8.2% (7,882) | 28.4% (720) |
Less than High School | 4.0% (3,784) | 10.5% (266) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.1% (29,776) | 17.8% (451) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lawrence vs Curwensville
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Lawrence and Curwensville at 0.5%.
- In Curwensville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.4% compared to 8.2% in Lawrence.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Curwensville at 10.5%, compared to 4.0% in Lawrence.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrence hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 17.8% in Curwensville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.