Demographics details for Lawrence, KS vs Cedar hill, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lawrence, KS vs Cedar hill, TX.
| Data | Lawrence | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 95,794 | 48,341 |
| Median Age | 28.8 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $59,834 | $84,132 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Lawrence vs Cedar hill
- In Lawrence, the population is higher at 95,794, compared to 48,341 in Cedar hill.
- The median age in Cedar hill is higher at 35.3 years, compared to 28.8 years in Lawrence.
- Cedar hill has a higher median income of $84,132, compared to $59,834 in Lawrence.
- In Cedar hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 32.0% in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.9% in Lawrence.
Demographics
Demographics Lawrence vs Cedar hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lawrence | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 51 |
| White | 71 | 11 |
| Asian | 6 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 9 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lawrence vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 51% compared to 5% in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 11% in Cedar hill.
- The Asian population is larger in Lawrence at 6% compared to 2% in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 7% in Lawrence.
- Both Lawrence and Cedar hill have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 9%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lawrence at 2% compared to 0% in Cedar hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lawrence | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 16.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 20.5% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 32.8% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lawrence vs Cedar hill
- More residents in Lawrence report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 16.1% in Cedar hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lawrence at 22.3% compared to 20.5% in Cedar hill.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Lawrence and Cedar hill at 14.8%.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lawrence at 19.6% compared to 17.7% in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has higher obesity rates at 35.9% compared to 32.8% in Lawrence.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cedar hill at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Lawrence.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lawrence | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (466) | 1.2% (578) |
| High School Diploma | 8.2% (7,882) | 13.4% (6,465) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (3,784) | 10.2% (4,909) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.1% (29,776) | 18.4% (8,890) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lawrence vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Lawrence.
- In Cedar hill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.4% compared to 8.2% in Lawrence.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cedar hill at 10.2%, compared to 4.0% in Lawrence.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrence hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 18.4% in Cedar hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.