Demographics details for Lawrence, KS vs Burleson, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lawrence, KS vs Burleson, TX.
| Data | Lawrence | Burleson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 95,794 | 53,381 |
| Median Age | 28.8 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $59,834 | $87,312 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Lawrence vs Burleson
- In Lawrence, the population is higher at 95,794, compared to 53,381 in Burleson.
- The median age in Burleson is higher at 35.4 years, compared to 28.8 years in Lawrence.
- Burleson has a higher median income of $87,312, compared to $59,834 in Lawrence.
- In Burleson, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 32.0% in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Burleson.
- Burleson has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.9% in Lawrence.
Demographics
Demographics Lawrence vs Burleson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lawrence | Burleson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 5 |
| White | 71 | 66 |
| Asian | 6 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 10 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lawrence vs Burleson
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Lawrence and Burleson at 5%.
- Lawrence has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 66% in Burleson.
- The Asian population is larger in Lawrence at 6% compared to 2% in Burleson.
- Burleson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 7% in Lawrence.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Burleson at 10%, compared to 9% in Lawrence.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lawrence at 2% compared to 0% in Burleson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lawrence | Burleson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 32.8% | 33.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lawrence vs Burleson
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Lawrence and Burleson at 16.5%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Burleson at 23.3% versus 22.3% in Lawrence.
- Burleson has a higher smoking rate at 15.2% compared to 14.8% in Lawrence.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Burleson at 19.8% compared to 19.6% in Lawrence.
- Burleson has higher obesity rates at 33.0% compared to 32.8% in Lawrence.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lawrence at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Burleson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lawrence | Burleson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (466) | 0.7% (389) |
| High School Diploma | 8.2% (7,882) | 14.5% (7,733) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (3,784) | 7.0% (3,744) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.1% (29,776) | 16.7% (8,907) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lawrence vs Burleson
- In Burleson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Lawrence.
- In Burleson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.5% compared to 8.2% in Lawrence.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Burleson at 7.0%, compared to 4.0% in Lawrence.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrence hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 16.7% in Burleson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.