Demographics details for Lavallette, NJ vs Folsom, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lavallette, NJ vs Folsom, CA.
| Data | Lavallette | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,838 | 83,269 |
| Median Age | 61.5 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $108,750 | $134,935 |
| Married Families | 56.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Lavallette vs Folsom
- The population in Folsom is higher at 83,269, compared to 1,838 in Lavallette.
- Residents in Lavallette have a higher median age of 61.5 years compared to 39.9 years in Folsom.
- Folsom has a higher median income of $134,935, compared to $108,750 in Lavallette.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lavallette at 56.0% compared to 44.0% in Folsom.
- The poverty level is higher in Folsom at 7%, compared to 0% in Lavallette.
- The unemployment rate in Lavallette is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.8% in Folsom.
Demographics
Demographics Lavallette vs Folsom provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lavallette | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 93 | 54 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 18 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lavallette vs Folsom
- In Folsom, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Lavallette.
- Lavallette has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 54% in Folsom.
- In Folsom, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 0% in Lavallette.
- Folsom has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 2% in Lavallette.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Folsom at 10%, compared to 5% in Lavallette.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lavallette and Folsom at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lavallette | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 13.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 9.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 29.6% | 28.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lavallette vs Folsom
- More residents in Lavallette report poor mental health at 14.4% compared to 13.9% in Folsom.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lavallette at 22.3% compared to 17.7% in Folsom.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lavallette at 11.3% compared to 9.5% in Folsom.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lavallette at 18.4% compared to 17.8% in Folsom.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lavallette at 29.6% compared to 28.0% in Folsom.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lavallette at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Folsom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lavallette | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (8) | 0.5% (451) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (343) | 7.7% (6,439) |
| Less than High School | 3.4% (63) | 6.1% (5,119) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 50.1% (921) | 36.4% (30,311) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lavallette vs Folsom
- In Folsom, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Lavallette.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lavallette hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 7.7% in Folsom.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Folsom at 6.1%, compared to 3.4% in Lavallette.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lavallette hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.1% compared to 36.4% in Folsom.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.