Demographics details for Lavallette, NJ vs Broken arrow, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lavallette, NJ vs Broken arrow, OK.
| Data | Lavallette | Broken arrow |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,838 | 117,911 |
| Median Age | 61.5 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $108,750 | $82,547 |
| Married Families | 56.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Lavallette vs Broken arrow
- The population in Broken arrow is higher at 117,911, compared to 1,838 in Lavallette.
- Residents in Lavallette have a higher median age of 61.5 years compared to 36.8 years in Broken arrow.
- Lavallette has a higher median income of $108,750 compared to $82,547 in Broken arrow.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lavallette at 56.0% compared to 43.0% in Broken arrow.
- The poverty level is higher in Broken arrow at 10%, compared to 0% in Lavallette.
- The unemployment rate in Lavallette is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.3% in Broken arrow.
Demographics
Demographics Lavallette vs Broken arrow provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lavallette | Broken arrow |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 93 | 65 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Lavallette vs Broken arrow
- In Broken arrow, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Lavallette.
- Lavallette has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 65% in Broken arrow.
- In Broken arrow, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Lavallette.
- Broken arrow has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 2% in Lavallette.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Broken arrow at 11%, compared to 5% in Lavallette.
- In Broken arrow, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Lavallette.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lavallette | Broken arrow |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 14.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 29.6% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lavallette vs Broken arrow
- In Broken arrow, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 14.4% in Lavallette.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Broken arrow at 25.0% versus 22.3% in Lavallette.
- Broken arrow has a higher smoking rate at 14.9% compared to 11.3% in Lavallette.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lavallette at 18.4% compared to 15.0% in Broken arrow.
- Broken arrow has higher obesity rates at 34.6% compared to 29.6% in Lavallette.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lavallette at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Broken arrow.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lavallette | Broken arrow |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (8) | 0.8% (935) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (343) | 13.2% (15,535) |
| Less than High School | 3.4% (63) | 6.6% (7,783) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 50.1% (921) | 22.2% (26,196) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lavallette vs Broken arrow
- In Broken arrow, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Lavallette.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lavallette hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 13.2% in Broken arrow.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Broken arrow at 6.6%, compared to 3.4% in Lavallette.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lavallette hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.1% compared to 22.2% in Broken arrow.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.